Delhi High Court

64,846 judgments

Year:

Vijay Dahiya v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Feb 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:1315

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life convict to accompany his son for board examinations, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. due to non-decision of the parole application by the competent authority.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole Section 482 Cr.P.C. writ petition parental responsibility

Nitco Logistic Pvt Ltd v. Rajiv Kumar

20 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:1292
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer cannot recover compensation from the vehicle owner without proving the driver's invalid licence and that the owner is not obliged to verify licence genuineness before appointing a driver.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving licence validity insurance company liability recovery rights

Fiyazuddin v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

20 Feb 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:1351-DB

The Delhi High Court directed police assistance to restore the petitioner’s wife to his custody under Habeas Corpus jurisdiction, recognizing her willingness to live with him amid a matrimonial dispute.

constitutional petition_allowed Habeas Corpus Article 226 Constitution of India Section 482 Cr.P.C. custody

Mano Karan & Ors. v. MCD & Ors.

20 Feb 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:1521-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Rehabilitation Policy protecting JJ dwellers of Kanak Durga Colony from demolition without alternate housing, directing respondents to act accordingly and dismissing the appellants’ claim of land surrender by Rajya Sabha Secretariat.

property appeal_dismissed Significant JJ Cluster Kanak Durga Colony in-situ upgradation rehabilitation policy

Kamlesh v. Sunita Sharma

20 Feb 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:1293

The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, dismissing the petitioner's challenge to valid sale documents and possession rights of the respondent, emphasizing the requirement of proving fraud with specificity and the binding effect of prior possession findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act dispossession possession suit oral family settlement

Sweta Tiwari v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

20 Feb 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:1349-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a habeas corpus petition directing the father to produce and hand over custody of the seven-month-old child to the mother, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount while leaving ultimate custody determination to the appropriate forum.

family petition_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus child custody welfare of child Article 226 Constitution

Vimal Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

20 Feb 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:1337
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's anticipatory bail plea in a serious assault-on-police case, emphasizing the gravity of offences and incomplete cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. assault on police externment order

Jamia Arabia Nizamia Welfare Education Society v. Delhi Development Authority

20 Feb 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:1335-DB

The Delhi High Court ordered CBI investigation and administrative reforms to address large-scale illegal construction and encroachment near protected monuments, emphasizing statutory authorities' duty to act promptly and effectively.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant illegal construction unauthorized construction encroachment Delhi Development Authority

Shibu Soren v. Lokpal of India & Anr.

20 Feb 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:1322-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Lokpal may order a preliminary inquiry before deciding on limitation under Section 53 and dismissed the appellant's premature writ petition challenging continuation of proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 Section 53 limitation preliminary inquiry Section 20(1)(a)

Tarun Babbar v. Asha Ram & Sons Pvt Ltd

20 Feb 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:1353-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal in a commercial suit for recovery of unpaid invoices, upholding the trial court's decree and interest award, and rejecting the defence of defective goods and non-maintainability due to mediation non-compliance.

civil appeal_dismissed Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 12A mediation Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 NI Act

Manoj Kumar Agarwal & Ors. v. State & Anr.

20 Feb 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:1299

The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR under Section 420 IPC arising from a settled commercial dispute, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR abuse of process commercial dispute

Texzone Information Services Pvt Ltd v. Ankur Goel & Ors.

20 Feb 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:1509

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition holding that the respondents had substantially complied with the consent terms and order requiring display of a disclaimer during an exhibition, and no willful disobedience was found.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court substantial compliance consent terms display of disclaimer

TV Today Network Ltd. v. Ankita Sodhi

20 Feb 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1532

The Delhi High Court upheld the gratuity claim of a contractual employee despite shortfall in continuous service and delay, rejecting employer's allegations of misconduct and confirming the condonation of delay under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 continuous service condonation of delay gratuity claim

Pankaj Raheja v. Kiara

20 Feb 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:1591
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing interim maintenance of Rs.35,000 per month to a minor autistic child, rejecting the petitioner's challenge to the income assessment and maintenance quantum.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance minor child autism income assessment

Mahtab Tyagi v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Feb 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:1266

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing cautious bail grant, risk of absconding, and directing trial expeditiousness.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity prolonged incarceration

Murli Manohar v. Priyanka Panchariya

20 Feb 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.10,000 per month based on reasonable income assessment and dismissed petitions challenging and seeking enhancement of the amount.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. income assessment income tax returns

Manju Gaind v. Kamla Rani & Ors.

20 Feb 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1651

The Delhi High Court held that the 120-day limit for filing Written Statements under its rules is generally inviolable and dismissed a 2000-day delay condonation application for lack of exceptionally sufficient cause, while allowing clarificatory amendments to pleadings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Written Statement Amendment of Pleadings Condonation of Delay Delhi High Court Rules

Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

20 Feb 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court held that exclusive management and control of Kalkaji Mandir rests with the Court-appointed Administrator, prohibiting unauthorized events and mandating strict safety, redevelopment, and crowd management measures.

administrative other Significant Kalkaji Mandir Independent Administrator Religious event permission Jagran incident

New Delhi Municipal Council v. Naresh Verma

20 Feb 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:374-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed NDMC's petition and upheld the Tribunal's ruling that recovery of excess pay made over five years ago is barred under the Supreme Court's Rafiq Masih judgment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation recovery of excess payment State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih judicial discretion

Rajendra v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax

19 Feb 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:1372-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and adherence to natural justice, setting aside a mechanically applied retrospective cancellation order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act natural justice