Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

Sandeep Tomar & Ors. v. State and Anr.

21 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2293

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC mutual consent divorce

Union of India & Anr. v. Pavan Ved

21 Mar 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:2299-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a delayed charge memo against a quasi-judicial Income Tax Commissioner, affirming that disciplinary action cannot be taken without malafide and that inordinate delay is a ground for dismissal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant quasi-judicial officer charge memo inordinate delay disciplinary proceedings

Saurabh Jain v. Neha Jain

21 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2368-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on the ground of cruelty where the wife publicly humiliated the husband by calling him impotent despite medical evidence of sterility, constituting mental cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 mental cruelty

Sh. Sonu Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2291

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Arun Khanna v. Vinod Khanna

21 Mar 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2371-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging non-initiation of contempt proceedings, holding that no appeal lies against such orders unless they decide merits or issue directions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contempt proceedings appeal maintainability Letters Patent Appeal Section 19 Contempt of Courts Act

Ashish Gupta & Ors. v. State Bank of India & Ors.

21 Mar 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:2430
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of a company's bank account as 'Fraud' for failure to provide the ex-directors an opportunity of hearing, following the Supreme Court's mandate to read principles of natural justice into RBI's Master Directions on Frauds.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Principles of Natural Justice Audi Alteram Partem RBI Master Directions on Frauds Fraud Account Classification

Md. Jailun v. State of NCT of Delhi

21 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2352-DB

The court held that an adult married woman has the right to decide her residence and refused to compel her production under Habeas Corpus, directing non-interference by relatives in the matrimonial life.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Adult married woman Right to residence Article 226 Constitution

JSW Steel Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Mar 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2391

Delhi High Court allowed writ petition directing manual correction and processing of MEIS benefits despite inadvertent errors in shipping bills and expiry of claim period.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Merchandise Exports from India Scheme MEIS benefits Shipping bills Customs Act Section 149

LA DOLCA PASTELERIA PVT LTD AND ANR. v. JAI SINGH AND ANR.

21 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2360

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant appellants two months to clear rent arrears and twelve weeks to vacate the commercial property, disposing of the appeal with the respondents' consent.

civil appeal_allowed rent arrears eviction time extension vacate property

V. P. Kothiyal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 Mar 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:2412

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 3(1)(r) and (s) of the SC/ST Act for lack of essential ingredients and malafide prosecution, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 3(1)(r) SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(s) SC/ST Act quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Kadeer Ahmed v. Zishan Zama Khan & Anr.

21 Mar 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2612

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to absence of title documents and failure to prove authority of the seller, holding that an Agreement to Sell alone does not confer ownership or maintainability.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Specific Performance Agreement to Sell Power of Attorney Title Documents

Suresh Gautam v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

21 Mar 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:2382

The Delhi High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application in a sexual harassment case leading to suicide, citing the seriousness of the offence and advanced trial stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail sexual harassment suicide Section 306 IPC

Vijay Malhotra v. Directorate of Education

21 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3096

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking restoration of a student’s name in a discretionary exchange programme, holding no legal right existed and no coercive or discriminatory conduct was established.

administrative petition_dismissed student exchange programme discretionary power coercive action discriminatory action

GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S PIONEER POWER LIMITED & ANR.

21 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5159

The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondents.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of arbitrator mandate arbitration proceedings

SKYLINE ENGINEERING CONTRACTS (INDIA) PVT LTD v. MMR SAHA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD

21 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6239

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate construction contract disputes, leaving all substantive objections open for arbitration.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

Subhash Arora v. Kalvinder Singh Sandhu & Ors.

20 Mar 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2383

The Delhi High Court held that trustees in bankruptcy appointed by a foreign court with independent remedies are not necessary parties to separate execution proceedings and upheld a mediation settlement reducing sale consideration in a property dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Execution Petition Bankruptcy Order Trustees in Bankruptcy Section 44A CPC

SH Rohit Agarwal v. SH R P Arora

20 Mar 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:2747-DB

The High Court held that earnest money and part payment must be refunded absent written refusal by buyer, allowing partial refund while excluding stamp duty and registration charges from appellant's liability.

civil appeal_partially_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC earnest money forfeiture Agreement to Sell and Purchase

Ajay Gautam v. Union of India through Chief Executive Officer FSSAI & Ors.

20 Mar 2024 · Manmohan, Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2364-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking FIR registration and SIT formation against Jagdish Ice Factory, holding the matter sub-judice and authorities had acted promptly, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies under CrPC.

constitutional petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation FIR registration Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Section 156(3) CrPC

Kirti v. Renu Anand & Ors.

20 Mar 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2370-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition invoking both Articles 226 and 227 entitles the parties to file an intra-court appeal under the Letters Patent when the Single Judge exercises jurisdiction primarily under Article 226.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters Patent Appeal Article 226 Article 227 Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007

K.R Anand v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation & Ors.

20 Mar 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh A... · 2024:DHC:2311-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that recovery of dues from DMRC without privity of contract is not maintainable by writ petition and must be pursued through civil suit or arbitration as per contract.

civil appeal_dismissed writ petition privity of contract recovery of money arbitration clause