Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Rachna Sagar Pvt Ltd v. Sovereign Mercantile Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed interim injunction restraining defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiff’s prior-used and registered trademarks, holding that plaintiff demonstrated prima facie passing off.
Vateena Begum v. Shamim Zaffar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of nearly seven years' delay in filing a first appeal, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Manish Gupta v. M/S P Singh Chit Fund Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition setting aside the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte decree due to non-service of summons, directing the petitioner to deposit part of the decree amount and appear for trial.
JK Lakshmi Cement Limited v. Ram Byash Yadav
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd. against unauthorized use of deceptively similar trademarks and trade dress by Defendant No. 1, affirming protection for well-known marks and allowing summary adjudication in absence of defense.
Vodafone Idea Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II
The Delhi High Court held that orders under Section 7-Q of the EPF Act are not independently appealable but interest computations under Section 7-Q included in Section 14-B orders can be challenged, and set aside a recovery certificate issued despite a conditional stay on damages.
D.T.C. v. Ami Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award setting aside a termination order due to a flawed departmental inquiry and limited the scope of writ jurisdiction in labor disputes.
AIIMS v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award granting compensation in lieu of reinstatement to a daily wage worker acquitted of theft charges, emphasizing limited writ jurisdiction and discretionary relief in labor disputes.
CP Century Hardware Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Skywood Interior Solutions
The Delhi High Court held that for an application under Order VII Rule 10(2) CPC, the court must accept the plaint's averments as true and if they disclose territorial jurisdiction, the plaint cannot be returned.
Gautam Mehra v. Sonia Mehra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against Family Court directions on child custody visitation due to non-compliance and rendered the appeal ineffective by the passage of time, leaving pending matters to the Family Court.
SPLENDOR BUILDWELL PVT LTD & ANR. v. RAJESH KUMAR PASRICHA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the limited grounds under Section 34 do not permit interference with the arbitrator's reasoned decision awarding principal and interest in a real estate dispute.
Magicon Impex Pvt Ltd v. Megnostar Telecommunications Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dissolved Megnostar Telecommunications Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956, ending winding up proceedings due to lack of assets and discharged the Official Liquidator.
Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd v. Shivaa Trading
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award as the sole arbitrator was de jure ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that such appointments are void ab initio absent an express written waiver.
Raj Kumar Hingorani v. Shilpi Srivastav
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal based on a lawful Memorandum of Settlement directing withdrawal of complaints and compliance with payment terms.
Rajeev Gupta v. Sarita Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging the validity of a registered Will and seeking partition of the deceased's estate is maintainable and dismissed the appeal against rejection of the plaint for want of cause of action.
Ayan Ahmed & Anr. v. GNCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, 323, 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that minor offences settled between parties can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Jagdev Singh alias Dev Singh alias Jasdev Singh and Anr. v. Competent Authority and Administrator
The Delhi High Court held that the Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA cannot condone delay beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed under Section 68(O) of the NDPS Act, and dismissed the writ petition challenging refusal of condonation.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. M/S. International Engineers & Project Consultant Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition and held that a suit under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for production of the entire arbitration record is maintainable despite prior receipt of the award copy, and once the record is filed, no further directions to the arbitrator are necessary.
Mohd Sauban Jirjis v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld a maintenance order directing heirs occupying inherited flats to pay monthly maintenance to their senior citizen grandmother under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.
Umeshwar Prasad v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claim for promotions and arrears, holding that promotion entitlements must follow Recruitment Rules and that delay in challenging non-promotion bars post-retirement claims.
Rajesh Kumar Sharawat and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354B, 509, 506, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of process in minor personal disputes.