Delhi High Court
49,371 judgments
M/S VANS INC USA v. FATEH CHAND BHANSALI & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to cancel the 'IVANS' marks, holding that prior honest use, product differentiation, and lack of deceptive similarity preclude cancellation despite the petitioner’s well-known 'VANS' trademark.
M/S VANS INC USA v. FATEH CHAND BHANSALI & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to cancel the respondent’s trademarks 'IVANS' and 'IV ANS NXT', holding that prior honest use, product differentiation, and lack of likelihood of confusion preclude removal despite the petitioner’s well-known 'VANS' mark.
Union of India v. M/S Mahesh Edible Oil Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal, holding that the petition challenging the arbitral award was barred by limitation and the delay could not be condoned beyond the statutory 30-day period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Kunwar Divyansh Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's valid policy decision to discontinue reservation for PMRBP awardees in Central Pool medical seats, holding that no legitimate expectation or enforceable right arose from past practice.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. v. MR PRABHJOT SINGH DHILLON
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's order directing the Department of Education to provide information on disciplinary actions against teachers for private tuitions, ruling that difficulty in collating voluminous information is not a valid ground for denial under the RTI Act.
Deepak @ Sunny v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Gulzar Ahmed & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Ador Welding Ltd. & Anr. v. Bansal Weld Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition due to bona fide disputes over the claimed debt, directing the petitioner to pursue civil proceedings instead.
Suliaman Agha Saihoon v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act, holding that Section 37 applies only to commercial quantity personally recovered and emphasizing the need for corroboration of disclosure statements at trial.
Kanhaiya Manjhi and Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
Delhi High Court directs NDMC to absorb surplus staff of a closed aided school in its own or aided schools under Rule 47 DSER, protecting their service continuity and salary rights.
Bunch Microtechnologies Pvt Ltd v. AMCP Edutech Pvt Ltd and Others
The Delhi High Court directed consolidation of all IP and investment disputes between the parties to a sole arbitrator, upheld interim protection of joint venture IP rights, and treated the Section 9 petition as a Section 17 application pending arbitration.
Millennium Education Management Private Limited v. Narayan Sewa Samiti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the respondent's delayed recall application challenging the appointment of an arbitrator, affirming the validity of the arbitration agreement and emphasizing that contractual disputes fall within the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction.
Prachi Jain v. Sunil Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court set aside the order denying maintenance to a petitioner post-majority and employment, directing the Sessions Court to reconsider her entitlement as an aggrieved person under the DV Act.
Manya Gupta v. Directorate of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition after the school granted regular admission to the petitioner as an EWS candidate with all entitled facilities, thereby redressing the grievance.
Feroz Ahmed Bhatt v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the parole petition of a life-convict terrorist, emphasizing security concerns and strict application of prison rules, but allowed a one-time video call with his elderly parents.
P. N. Murli v. Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking order rejecting a reinstated employee's promotion representation and directed fresh consideration with reasons and hearing.
Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Dr. Ashok Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting age relaxation benefits to a State Government employee for appointment under ESIC recruitment rules, rejecting the petitioner's contention limiting such benefits to Central Government employees only.
Kotak Mahindra General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Afroj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal but modified and enhanced the compensation awarded to the injured claimant in a motor accident case, correcting minimum wages and increasing amounts for pain and suffering and loss of marriage prospects.
AIMS SANYA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. v. BRAHAMA INTERNATIONAL LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to recall the complainant for cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that change of counsel is not a valid ground and emphasizing the need to prevent undue trial delay.
Ritu Rajput v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court ordered custody of a minor to her mother after finding no evidence of unlawful detention, based on the minor’s statements and medical examination.