Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

Sanjay Kumar v. University of Delhi

13 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a direct recruitment advertisement, holding that promotion was not possible due to lack of eligible departmental candidates as per Recruitment Rules, 2008.

administrative petition_dismissed Recruitment Rules 2008 Promotion Direct Recruitment Limited Departmental Examination

Nikhil Sehgal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

13 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4150

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for grant of Probate of the last Will of Late Shri Tejinder Chawla, confirming its valid execution and excluding a non-owned property from the estate.

civil petition_allowed Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 valid execution of Will attesting witnesses

Sandeep Kumar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4195

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Yogesh and Ors. v. State of Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4184

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing prevention of abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Vipin and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:4199

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/365/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 308 IPC

Sangeeta Mulwani; Jyoti Pardasani v. Kavita Keswani

13 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3988

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to declare a Will genuine, which is exclusively within the Probate Court's domain under the Indian Succession Act, and accordingly dismissed the suit seeking such declaration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will Indian Succession Act, 1925 Civil court jurisdiction Probate

Sanjay Kumar v. Hans Raj College

13 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4017

The Delhi High Court quashed recovery notices issued after seven years for alleged excess payments during study leave, applying the Supreme Court's five-year limitation rule in Rafiq Masih.

administrative petition_allowed Significant recovery of excess payment study leave Comptroller and Auditor General report Rafiq Masih judgment

Vicky and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3882

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC amicable settlement

Group 4 Securities Guarding Ltd. v. Secy. Labour, Govt. of NCT of Delhi

13 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4057

The Delhi High Court held that bonus must be computed strictly as per the Payment of Bonus Act's definition of salary or wages, excluding allowances like house rent allowance, and quashed the Industrial Tribunal's award directing computation based on minimum wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 Section 2(21) Minimum Wages Act, 1948 bonus computation

Rekha and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

13 May 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3958

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Jal Board to pay enhanced compensation of Rs. 30 lakhs to families of deceased manual scavengers in line with Supreme Court mandates prohibiting manual scavenging and mandating rehabilitation.

labor petition_allowed Significant manual scavenging compensation enhancement Delhi Jal Board forced labour

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Maharaji Education Trust

13 May 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:4938-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reassessment under Section 148 was valid based on prima facie material, and that charging capitation fees disqualifies a charitable trust from exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 reassessment capitation fee charitable trust exemption

Shikha Chakravarty & Ors. v. Major Saumitra Sarkar (Retd.)

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5922

The Delhi High Court disposed of the execution petition enforcing conditional repair obligations and lift access under a settlement agreement, directing compliance by the respondent upon requests from the petitioners.

civil other Settlement Agreement Execution Petition Clause 11 Repairs Clause 12 Lift Access

Delhi Development Authority v. Rajender Singh

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1418-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Central Administrative Tribunal's unreasoned order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration to ensure a reasoned decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal order setting aside remand lack of reasoning

Sgt. Mrityunjai v. Ex Sgt Akhileshwar Singh Yadav

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal presumption of service connection

Kamal Raheja v. Hahnemann Pure Drug Co.

13 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5613-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a registered trademark proprietor's right to injunction against infringement is not defeated by non-use or suspension of related licenses, affirming that registration alone suffices to claim relief under the Trade Marks Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Trademark infringement Commercial use Section 28(1)

Ahluwalia Contracts India Ltd v. Union of India

11 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5053

The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following the recusal of the originally appointed arbitrator, directing continuation of arbitral proceedings with fees fixed as per the Fourth Schedule.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15(2) Substitute Arbitrator Arbitral Proceedings

Baljeet Kaur Kalra v. Harpreet Singh Kalra

10 May 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2955

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a civil suit concerning the same property to the court where a related suit is pending, directing the suit to continue from its current stage without deciding on consolidation.

civil appeal_allowed transfer of suit civil suit judicial convenience same property

Dr Arun Kumar Soni v. Medical Council of India & Anr.

10 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3919

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner accused of impersonation in the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination cannot be granted medical registration pending criminal trial and must clear the examination personally.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Foreign Medical Graduate Examination impersonation medical registration criminal proceedings

Arvind v. State NCT of Delhi

10 May 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3876

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation at the early stage of investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. murder Section 302 IPC

Arun Kangra v. Arti Sarwan

10 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3984-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant a final opportunity to submit defense and directed the Family Court to frame issues and proceed with evidence in a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

family appeal_allowed Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) divorce petition family court