Delhi High Court

49,371 judgments

Year:

Ravi Dutt & Ors. v. Dal Chand

14 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4141

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of Will beneficiaries as parties in a partition suit and modified the Preliminary Decree to reflect their rightful share under the probated Will.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit probated Will Order 1 Rule 10 CPC impleadment

Dheeraj Sharma and Others v. Neeraj Chandra and Others

14 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4049

Delhi High Court held that employees of recognized private schools are entitled to pay and arrears as per 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations without limitation of three years, directing schools to comply under Section 10 of the DSE Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 10 Pay Commission recommendations 6th Pay Commission

Mahinder Singh v. Jaswant Kaur & Ors.

14 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3989

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition, holding that an oral partition admitted and acted upon by the parties bars a subsequent partition suit, and that vague pleadings without particulars fail to sustain the claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral partition memorandum of partition Order XII Rule 6 CPC Order VI Rule 4 CPC

Maya and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

14 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:4033
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging retrenchment of temporary employees post-bank merger, holding that the petitioners must exhaust statutory remedies under the Industrial Disputes Act before invoking writ jurisdiction.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-F writ jurisdiction

Zahid Hussain v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

14 May 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh A... · 2024:DHC:4065-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DRT's dismissal of the SARFAESI application, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appellate remedy before the DRAT and that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked to reappraise findings of fact or procedural compliance.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(4) Debt Recovery Tribunal Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Narendra Gupta & Ors. v. Paramjit Singh & Ors.

14 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3951

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of motor accident compensation claims for lack of opportunity and procedural non-compliance, remanding for fresh hearing with directions to ensure fair trial and scrutiny.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Section 158(6) Motor Vehicles Act Compensation claim Fake claims

Vertice Global Private Limited v. M/S Shavex

14 May 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:4000-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the trademark 'SHAVEX', directing expeditious disposal of pending interlocutory applications while the injunction continues.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction Order XXXIX CPC trademark infringement passing off

Narcotic Control Bureau v. Aqyar Khan Shinwari

14 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3978
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to an accused in an NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory Section 52A procedures and prolonged pre-trial detention, emphasizing the necessity of Magistrate-certified sampling for valid prosecution evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 52A compliance bail in NDPS cases prolonged pre-trial detention

Novateur Electrical and Digital Systems Pvt. Ltd. v. Mani Kumar. V Proprietor of M/s Devi Electricals

14 May 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:4018

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes between a company and its distributor.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator

Kari Yadav v. The State & Anr.

14 May 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3973

The Delhi High Court held that sentences awarded under Section 138 NI Act for dishonour of cheques issued in the same transaction must run concurrently under Section 427 Cr.P.C., allowing the petition to that effect.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 427 Cr.P.C. Concurrent sentence Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act

Dr. Neerja Samajdar v. Jawaharlal Nehru University

14 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:4058

The Delhi High Court directed Jawaharlal Nehru University to consider the petitioner's promotion application under the UGC Career Advancement Scheme within six weeks, providing a personal hearing and disposing of her representation in accordance with law.

administrative other Career Advancement Scheme UGC Regulations Promotion delay Writ petition

Chaman Singh and Ors. v. DDA and Anr.

14 May 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:4073

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking stay of demolition and directions for land demarcation in Village Chak Chilla, holding that the land has been duly demarcated and possession lies with the DDA.

property petition_dismissed demolition proceedings land demarcation Delhi Development Authority Village Chak Chilla

Vemparala Srikant and Anr. v. General Secretary, India Bulls Centrum Flat Owners Welfare Co-operative Society, Hyderabad

14 May 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:4044
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the dispute arising entirely in Hyderabad must be adjudicated by the High Court of Telangana despite the NCDRC being located in Delhi.

civil petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction forum conveniens writ petition consumer dispute

Dr. Minakshi Garg v. Delhi Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research University

14 May 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3994

The Delhi High Court held that judicial review of a Show Cause Notice challenging academic qualifications is premature and directed the University to consider the petitioner's reply before taking any removal action.

administrative petition_dismissed Show Cause Notice judicial review UGC Regulations 2018 academic appointment eligibility

Vikas Mittal v. State & Anr.

14 May 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:4032

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of ₹65,000 per month to the wife, affirming the husband's legal obligation to maintain her based on assessed income despite his claims of financial incapacity.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC income assessment matrimonial dispute

Bhaskar & Ors. v. State and Anr.

14 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3918

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under matrimonial offence sections following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mutual consent divorce

Ramehs Chand v. D.T.C.

14 May 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3906

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Tribunal's dismissal of a suspended employee's claim for enhanced subsistence allowance, holding that the reduction to 75% after the first year is consistent with the plain language of the DRTA regulations.

labor petition_dismissed subsistence allowance suspension Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Delhi Road Transport Authority Act, 1950

State v. P.D.D.

14 May 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:3904-DB

The Delhi High Court reversed the acquittal of a father accused of sexually assaulting his minor daughter, holding that the victim's credible sole testimony and satisfactory explanation for delay warranted conviction under the POCSO Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sexual assault POCSO Act delay in reporting sole testimony

Rajesh Kumar Jain v. J.C. Trading

14 May 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3901

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 N.I. Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption that the cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Presumption under Section 139 Rebuttable presumption

Gurbakhsh Singh Ba Builders Private Limited v. Fortis Hospital Limited

14 May 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3900
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court transferred nascent winding up petitions to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that such proceedings must be adjudicated by the NCLT unless irreversible winding up steps have been taken.

corporate other Significant winding up Companies Act, 2013 Section 434 transfer to NCLT