Delhi High Court

46,774 judgments

Year:

Pravesh Narula Trading as M/s. Capital Enterprises v. Raj Kumar Jain Trading as M/s. Bholaram Puranmall and Anr.

29 Oct 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:8405
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to include subsequent trademark registration during trial, permitting relief for trademark infringement alongside passing off to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC trademark registration passing off

M/S INNOVATIVE FACILITY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PVT LTD & ANR

29 Oct 2024 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2024:DHC:8426

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining termination of a service agreement by enforcing a negative covenant to maintain status quo during arbitration proceedings under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Specific Relief Act, 1963 negative covenant

Kapil Khanna v. Continental India Private Limited

29 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8409-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the architect's appeal for recovery of unpaid consultancy fees, holding that failure to complete contractual deliverables disentitles payment beyond completed stages.

civil appeal_dismissed consultancy contract staged payments scope of work completion of work

PNC Infratech Limited v. Union of India through Ministry of Road Transport and Highways & Anr.

29 Oct 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:8425

The Delhi High Court upheld MoRTH's jurisdiction and decision to debar petitioners from tendering based on credible evidence of corruption, dismissing challenges to procedural fairness and sufficiency of evidence.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant debarment integrity pact jurisdiction natural justice

Dr. G K Arora v. State

29 Oct 2024 · Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8394

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of accused under Section 306 IPC, holding that prima facie material existed based on the deceased's suicide note and dying declarations despite closure reports exonerating them.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 306 IPC Abetment of suicide Dying declaration Suicide note

Joyi Kitty Joseph v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8392-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the preventive detention of a habitual gold smuggler under COFEPOSA, holding that credible material and past conduct justified detention despite bail and ongoing investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant preventive detention COFEPOSA Act, 1974 smuggling foreign origin gold

Rahul v. State Govt of NCT Delhi

29 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8397-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder and attempt to murder, affirming that identification in Court corroborated by weapon recovery and ballistic evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Identification of accused Doctrine of transfer of malice Section 302 IPC Section 301 IPC

EICORE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ORS. v. EEXPEDISE TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ORS.

29 Oct 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:8385

The Delhi High Court held that additional documents existing prior to suit must be filed with the plaint unless reasonable cause is shown, emphasizing strict procedural compliance under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil other Significant Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 reasonable cause late filing of documents

Daiichi Sankyo Company Limited v. Malvinder Mohan Singh and Ors.

29 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8398

The Delhi High Court held that under Order XXI Rule 66 CPC, a judgment debtor's asset can be auctioned without fixing an upset price or prior valuation, and objections on valuation can be considered only before confirming the sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXI Rule 66 CPC execution proceedings public auction Fortis trademark

M/S. SONAM FURNITURE v. WOOD TECH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

29 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8414

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to compel cross-examination of an expert and recall of another expert, directing the Trial Court to consider objections and requests before final disposal of the commercial suit.

civil petition_dismissed cross-examination expert witness supplementary report trial court discretion

Vaibhav Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement

29 Oct 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:8408
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioners in a PMLA case, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention without timely trial violates Article 21 rights and overrides stringent statutory bail conditions under Section 45 of PMLA.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Prevention of Money Laundering Act Article 21 right to speedy trial

HR BUILDERS THROUGH GPA HOLDER v. DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD

29 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8400
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to inordinate and unexplained delay in its issuance, holding such delay violates the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and public policy.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitral award Inordinate delay Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Failure to act

Star India Private Limited & Anr. v. Jiolive.tv & Ors.

29 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8521

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and directed blocking of rogue websites illegally streaming ICC World Cup 2023 matches, affirming exclusive broadcast rights and permitting summary judgment in uncontested copyright infringement suits.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement broadcast reproduction rights permanent injunction rogue websites

N.S. Associates Pvt. Ltd. v. The Life Insurance Corporation of India

29 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8401
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to invalid unilateral appointment of the arbitrator, holding that the arbitration seat was Delhi despite a contract clause conferring jurisdiction on Kanpur courts, and no express written waiver of arbitrator ineligibility was established.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration seat jurisdiction unilateral appointment Section 12(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Adani Enterprises Limited v. Shri Somnath Fabrics Private Limited

29 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8399

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing refund of earnest money deposit with interest, holding that absence of a signed contract and waiver by acceptance of instalment payments precluded forfeiture of the deposit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Earnest Money Deposit Coal Sale and Purchase Agreement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge

M/S TRAVEL2 AGENT.COM v. M/S SPICE JET LTD.

29 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8402

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing Spice Jet Ltd. to reimburse Travel2 Agent.com for proven expenditures due to breach of contract but set aside unsubstantiated damages awarded by the tribunal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Indian Contract Act, 1872 Damages

Vasishta Mantena NH04 JV v. Blacklead Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

29 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 636

The Delhi High Court held that a Section 34 petition filed beyond the extendable limitation period is time-barred and the General Clauses Act does not apply to extend the discretionary period under the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition limitation period General Clauses Act, 1897

Ashok Gupta & Anr v. Deepak Rao

28 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7894
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition as infructuous after possession was restored to the landlord through execution, affirming limited revisional scope and landlord's ownership established by family settlement.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 revision petition eviction possession restored

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-6, New Delhi v. Freescale Semiconductor India Pvt. Ltd.

28 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8407-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s exclusion of functionally dissimilar entities as comparables in transfer pricing, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal against ALP adjustments for AY 2013-14.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant transfer pricing arm’s length price comparability analysis functional dissimilarity

MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD. v. SIDHI HERBAL AND HEALING CENTER

28 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8422

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate loan repayment disputes where the respondents defaulted and failed to respond to notices.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 3 Appointment of arbitrator