Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
M/S RKMT BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed reference of additional contractual claims to the existing Sole Arbitrator subject to parties' waiver of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, thereby facilitating arbitration despite unilateral appointment concerns.
Sequential Technology International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT, Spcl. Range-7
The Delhi High Court allowed the taxpayer's appeal and remanded the transfer pricing dispute for fresh examination of the inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable entity, holding that the authorities erred in rejecting objections based on non-availability of audited financial data and functional dissimilarity.
Smita Chaudhary v. Taruna Yadav
The Delhi High Court held that deposit of sale consideration suffices to purge contempt for breach of injunction restraining alienation of suit property, dismissing the petitioner's plea for cancellation of sale deeds.
Rishi Bansal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(6)
The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening of income tax assessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 due to erroneous conclusions on escaped income and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper application of mind.
Prof. Madan Mohan v. University of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that delayed payment of retirement gratuity to a University employee attracts statutory interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, overruling the University's contention based on the New Pension Scheme.
MS Shubhangi Gupta v. Commissioner of Customs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of a statutory show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 is unlawful and directed immediate release of the detained watch.
Dr. Hans U. Nagar v. John Nagar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for lack of evidence of willful disobedience of status quo orders limited to two servant quarters on Farm No.8, emphasizing that contempt requires clear proof of deliberate violation.
Unilin Beheer B.V. v. Balaji Action Buildwell
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to file confidential third-party license agreements in sealed cover and directed the constitution of a confidentiality club, holding that reasonable cause justified filing additional documents during the suit.
M/S KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes where parties failed to agree on appointment, directing the arbitrator to decide maintainability and arbitrability objections at the outset.
Sony India Private Limited v. IT Care
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration to proceed after the petitioner demonstrated valid service and existence of an arbitration agreement.
Ashok Kumar v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous and is not maintainable once possession of the premises is restored to the landlord through execution proceedings.
ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LIMITED v. HTTPS//TUNEINCOM/PODCASTS/ARTS—CULTURE
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Entertainment Network (India) Ltd against unauthorized use of its copyrighted audio content and trademarks by defendants, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-filing of written statements.
Janki Devi Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly registered Will to the sole beneficiary and natural heir, exempting her from filing administration and surety bonds in an uncontested petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
R.K SHARMA v. BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD.
The High Court dismissed the Revision Petition challenging the refusal to transfer a civil appeal, holding that alleged bias and procedural grievances did not justify transfer under Section 24 CPC.
Vijay Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal
The Delhi High Court directed the Sashastra Seema Bal to prepare and operate a waiting list to fill unoccupied constable vacancies, ensuring eligible candidates are appointed without retrospective seniority.
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. Aditya Yadav and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendant's use of 'Dream11' sub-domain for trademark infringement and passing off, proceeding ex parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-appearance.
VIGYAPAN LOKE DELHI ADVERTISING C.G.H.S. LTD v. WAZIR HUSSAIN
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and dismissed the plaintiff's money recovery suit as barred by limitation, holding that limitation commences from the date of invoices and mere balance sheet entries do not extend limitation.
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. John Doe and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and ex parte decree against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off by replicating the plaintiff's website and marks, relying on Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-appearance.
Geeta Katyal v. Manak Portfolios (P) Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the appellants' suit and decree in favor of respondents, holding that withdrawal of an earlier suit without permission bars instituting a fresh suit on the same subject matter under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC.
Manmeet Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that DDA cannot require MCD verification of a structural safety certificate issued by a licensed engineer and directed DDA to process the petitioner’s amalgamation application without further delay.