Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. v. MAJ(RETD) SUKESH BEHL & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity and infringement of Philips’ Standard Essential Patent relating to DVD replication technology, rejecting defendants’ invalidity claims and affirming the plaintiff’s entitlement to damages and injunction.
Gurjant Singh v. The Chief Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court granted a limited extension of time to the petitioner to pay the compounding fee under the Customs Act due to financial constraints, emphasizing limited judicial interference with compounding orders.
Priyanka Kumari v. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a bank officer for prolonged unauthorized absence after she failed to comply with a valid transfer order despite repeated opportunities and personal circumstances not warranting exemption.
Kailash v. Rohtash Kumar
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant a six-month extension to vacate premises upon an undertaking, staying eviction execution and encouraging amicable settlement.
Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Sumit
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting exemption from the typewriting test to a certified orthopaedically disabled candidate, emphasizing reasonable accommodation under the RPWD Act despite procedural lapses.
Addictive Learning Technology Limited & Anr. v. Aditya Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defamation suit against tweets on social media platform X, holding that the plaintiffs failed to establish legal injury or cause of action considering the conversational nature of the platform and statutory remedies available.
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. v. HCC Samsung JV
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 33 application seeking review beyond clerical corrections does not extend the limitation period under Section 34, dismissing the petition as time-barred.
Rajendri Devi v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that persons whose land is acquired have no absolute right to alternative plot allotment in a particular area, and the DDA’s policy allotting plots only in developing areas is valid and immune from judicial interference.
A.R. ASSOCIATES P.LTD. & ANR. v. D.D.A. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of a plot allotment by DDA due to the petitioner's failure to submit mandatory Sales Tax documents required under the allotment scheme for paper merchants.
Aditya & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging DDA's use of GATE 2021 scores for recruitment, emphasizing the principle of laches and the need to raise grounds before the tribunal.
Vee Ess Electricals and Aircon v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a public tender process on the ground that no obligation existed to individually notify bidders and the petitioner’s negligence in monitoring public tender notifications did not vitiate the process.
Satinder Singh Bhasin v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the UP Police's inter-state arrest of the petitioner without following prescribed protocols was illegal, directed compliance with established procedures, and ordered inquiry into the arrest circumstances.
Punjab FC Private Limited v. Posshusa Apparels India Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Punjab FC's petition to cancel a deceptively similar 'PFC' trademark registration held by Posshusa Apparels, holding that dishonest adoption of a prior mark warrants rectification under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Neelkanth Pharma Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that investigating agencies must assign reasons before freezing entire bank accounts in cybercrime cases, favoring marking a lien on disputed amounts to protect innocent account holders' fundamental right to livelihood.
Sh. Hari Ram and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that landowners whose land was acquired have no absolute right to alternative plots in the same zone, and the DDA's policy allotting plots in developing areas like Narela is lawful and entitled to judicial deference.
Daljeet Singh Gill v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ challenging disqualification under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme due to lack of proof of investigation, directing acceptance of declared tax liability and quashing the show cause notice upon deposit.
Rajnish Kumar Biswakarma & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed charges under Section 498A IPC due to annulment of marriage but allowed proceedings under Sections 406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act to continue.
Mr. Ankit Rana, Mr. Tushar Rohmetra and Mr. Srikant Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR under Section 106 BNSS based on a compromise and absence of gross negligence, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS in the interest of justice.
Sonu Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to an accused in an NDPS case due to evasion of arrest, criminal antecedents, and necessity of custodial interrogation despite the sole reliance on co-accused's disclosure statement.
Y S Chowdary v. Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court held that FERA proceedings are adjudicatory and not criminal, thus the term "guilty" used by the Appellate Tribunal is inappropriate and must be redacted, while upholding the imposed penalties.