Delhi High Court
97,209 judgments
Shervani Hospitalities Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be imposed where the assessee has fully disclosed facts and made a bona fide, debatable legal claim, even if ultimately disallowed.
Parmod Kumar Kaushik & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that seniority fixation for Inspectors/Accountants absorbed on merit cannot be altered by counting prior service under deputation-related Office Memorandums, setting aside the revised seniority list that downgraded the petitioners.
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. v. Mr. Onkar Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Detailed Agreement validly assigned exclusive copyrights to the plaintiff, and defendants infringed these rights by unauthorized release of the album, granting permanent injunction and related reliefs.
Dilbagh Kaur Chandok v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a Section 138 NI Act case, holding that unaccounted cash transactions are illegal and unenforceable liabilities.
S P Ashta v. Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board
The Delhi High Court held that pay scale upgradation for a Superintending Engineer depends on completion of 13 years of Group 'A' service counted from promotion to a Group 'A' post and that Central Government service guidelines do not apply to the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board.
Brahm Singh v. Pramila Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal challenging a permanent injunction in favor of the respondent who proved ownership and possession of disputed land, holding that the appellant failed to establish any title or possession.
Shahnaz Ali & Anr v. Suresh Kumar Gera & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of legal heirs seeking leave to defend a suit after their predecessor-in-interest withdrew the original leave to defend application and made admissions acknowledging liability.
Balwan Singh & Ors. v. DDA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Lt. Governor's revisional order annulling fraudulent land consolidation proceedings under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings Act without prior notice, recognizing pervasive fraud as unlawful consideration dispensing with the right to hearing.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that pension benefits for SVRS optees are payable by DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service rules under CCS Pension Rules, and mandated constitution of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension payments to employees who took voluntary retirement under DISCOMs’ SVRS are payable by the DISCOMs and not the pension trust, clarified the interpretation of CCS Pension Rules on qualifying service, and upheld the mandatory constitution of arbitral tribunals to determine additional pension contributions.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for voluntary retirement under DISCOMS’ SVRS are payable by the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension payments for employees opting for special voluntary retirement schemes by electricity DISCOMS are the companies' liability, not the Pension Trust's, and clarified pension eligibility rules under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 including rounding of qualifying service but excluding five years’ weightage for eligibility.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension payments to employees under Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are initially payable by DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified the interpretation of CCS Pension Rules on qualifying service and pension eligibility, and upheld the constitution of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes lie with the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified pension calculation rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension payments to employees who voluntarily retired under DISCOMS’ special schemes are payable by the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the interpretation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that pension payments for voluntary retirees under DISCOMs’ SVRS are payable by the DISCOMs, not the Pension Trust, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pensionary benefits under Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are payable by DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine liabilities.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension benefits for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes are not payable from the Pension Trust, mandated constitution of arbitral tribunals to determine additional employer contributions, and clarified the computation of qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liabilities for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes by electricity DISCOMS are not payable from the Pension Trust but initially by DISCOMS, and clarified the correct interpretation of qualifying service and pension rules under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Government of Delhi v. North Delhi Power Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension liability for employees opting for Special Voluntary Retirement Schemes lies with the DISCOMS, not the Pension Trust, clarified qualifying service calculations under CCS Pension Rules, and upheld the necessity of Arbitral Tribunals to determine additional contributions.