Delhi High Court
96,004 judgments
Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education
Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.
Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.
Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.
Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.
Jeetu Saini v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to recall prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused’s right to a fair trial and directing the trial court to complete the process without undue delay.
Anil Singal v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's invalidation of minimum interview cut-off marks for male open category SI Executive candidates, directed reworking of the select list accordingly, but upheld female and departmental male candidate lists where unaffected.
Kafil Ahmad v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without providing separate detailed reasoning.
Kafil Ahmad v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without passing separate orders.
Santosh Kumar Rout v. Hyderabad Trade Expo Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of the arbitrator's mandate, holding that a party must await the arbitral award to challenge the arbitrator's impartiality after an unsuccessful Section 12 application.
The Coca-Cola Company & Anr v. V.B. Rao trading as M/s. Om Sri VenkataSai Enterprises
The Delhi High Court granted permanent and mandatory injunctions against the Defendant for infringing the Plaintiffs' registered DANUBE BOTTLE shape trademark and KINLEY label, ordering recall and destruction of infringing products and awarding costs.
Satish @ Madrasi v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
Two criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court were disposed of by a common judgment referencing a detailed decision in a related appeal.
Satish @ Madrasi v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The High Court of Delhi disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related appeal, without independent adjudication.
State v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed the death sentence of three accused for the brutal kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl based on overwhelming DNA and forensic evidence.
State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of three accused for the brutal kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on unshaken DNA evidence and voluntary confessions.
State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of three accused for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on unshaken DNA and forensic evidence along with corroborative witness testimony.
State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the death sentence of three accused for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on strong DNA and forensic evidence and proper procedural compliance.
Coral Telecom Ltd v. Elcom Innovations Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator, holding that no valid arbitration agreement exists between Coral Telecom and Elcom Innovations Pvt. Ltd. under the MoUs invoked.
Hari Om v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal of Hari Om by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.
Mr. Rajiv Kapoor & Mr. Srikant Sharma, Advocates. v. CEC-HCC JOINT VENTURE .....
The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award granting delay damages to the contractor, rejecting NHAI's challenge on procedural and substantive grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Liyakat Ali v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police constable for attempted murder using his service revolver, rejecting his plea of self-defence and false implication.