Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Surender Singh Dalal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

01 May 1984 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:5613-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the 2009 amendment to CISF recruitment rules reducing promotion quota and introducing LDCE, ruling it non-arbitrary and constitutionally valid under Articles 14 and 16.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant CISF Recruitment Rules promotion quota Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Article 14

Prof R Chandra v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Jun 1982 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7991-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing pension benefits to be granted by reckoning past service after the appellant refunded CPF benefits with interest, applying the retrospective provisions of the 1984 office memorandum.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pension qualifying service contributory provident fund office memorandum 1984

Prof R Chandra v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.

23 Jun 1982 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:7990-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an employee who has received pro-rata retirement benefits can count past service for pension by refunding benefits with interest under the retrospective Office Memorandum No.28-10/84-Pension, allowing the appeal and directing pension disbursement accordingly.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pension qualifying service contributory provident fund office memorandum

Gurbachan Singh v. UOI

06 Dec 1981 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:399-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Security Force Court’s conviction and dismissal of a BSF Sub-Inspector for firing at and assaulting colleagues while intoxicated, holding that pre-trial procedural irregularities without shown prejudice do not vitiate the trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Rules, 1969 Security Force Court Procedural irregularities Attempt to commit culpable homicide

Delhi Development Authority v. Hello Home Education Society

26 Sep 1981 · D. N. Patel; Jyoti Singh · 2021:DHC:3574-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent's right to institutional land allotment based on prior approval and rejected retrospective application of amended allotment rules, affirming the doctrine of legitimate expectation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant institutional land allotment Delhi Development Authority Essentiality Certificate Nazul Rules amendment

Deepak Verma v. Daya Nand

01 Jul 1981 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:3103

Limitation for substitution of a deceased defendant runs from the date of death, not knowledge thereof, and substitution applications filed beyond 90 days without condonation are barred.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXII Rule 4 CPC substitution of legal heirs limitation period abatement of suit

Dr J Thulaseedhara Kurup v. Appointments Committee of the Cabinet & Ors.

18 Feb 1980 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2023:DHC:5666
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the ACC’s rejection of the petitioner’s candidature for Director of NSD, holding no obligation to record reasons absent statutory mandate and no arbitrariness in the administrative decision.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Appointments Committee of the Cabinet administrative decision recording reasons judicial review

M/S Hadiso Construction Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Commissioner Employees Compensation & Ors.

19 Nov 1979 · J.R. Midha · 2017:DHC:7954
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the principal employer is liable to pay compensation under Section 12 of the Employees’ Compensation Act regardless of contractual clauses, interest runs from the date of accident, and penalty under Section 4A(3) requires a show cause opportunity.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act Section 12 liability principal employer contractor liability

Chattar Singh & Ors. v. MCD

12 Dec 1978 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1959-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the land ownership dispute to the Estate Officer for fresh evidence and decision, emphasizing the need for proper demarcation and respecting pending status quo orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant land ownership dispute layout plan Municipal Corporation of Delhi Estate Officer

Neelu Chadha v. Sunil Sethi & Ors.

23 Sep 1978 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2026:DHC:655

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition and declaration over ancestral property, holding the declaration claim barred by limitation and upholding an oral family partition executed during minority as valid and binding.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit limitation period Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act oral family arrangement

Prem Bhatia & Ors. v. Kamlesh Bhalla & Ors.

18 Sep 1978 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:1102-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the registered deed of partition, ordered removal of illegal encroachments by defendants, and directed a practical resolution for access and share rights in a family property dispute.

property appeal_allowed deed of partition property partition illegal encroachment co-owners' rights

Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Aug 1977 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9830-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 17

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s voluntary retirement took effect on 1 February 2018 by deemed acceptance, entitling him to pensionary benefits despite subsequent procedural formalities.

administrative petition_allowed Significant voluntary retirement Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Rule 48(A) technical resignation

Union of India v. Central PWD Engineers Association

26 May 1977 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9151-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside a CAT order promoting engineers based on a fictitious 1977 Notification, remanding the matter for fresh consideration excluding reliance on that Notification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Promotion eligibility Central Public Works Department Notification dated 26 May 1977 Diploma equivalence

North East Engineering and Construction v. Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited

15 Dec 1976 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:811
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes under a valid arbitration agreement are prima facie arbitrable and appointed an arbitrator, leaving detailed arbitrability and merits to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Arbitrability Contractual claim notice

Amit Johri v. Deepak Johri & Ors.

19 Jul 1976 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1009-DB

The Delhi High Court held that property inherited under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is self-acquired property of the heir and does not vest by birth in his son, dismissing the suit for partition and possession by the son during the father's lifetime.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 8 ancestral property self-acquired property

Darshan Kaur v. Union of India

31 Mar 1976 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:7208
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that misuse charges are payable for exclusive office use of leased property by a foreign mission, dismissed the petitioner's challenge, and upheld the demand as a condition for conversion from leasehold to freehold.

property petition_dismissed Significant misuse charges leasehold to freehold conversion foreign mission Office Order No. 29/83

Reserve Bank of India v. B S Rawat

01 Feb 1973 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1600-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's reduction of dismissal to discharge simpliciter, affirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction and the principle of proportionality in punishment under the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Section 11A modification of punishment dismissal from service

Jagdish Prasad & Ors. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

01 Jan 1973 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:3360

The Delhi High Court held that employees occupying staff quarters provided by UGC-funded colleges or their Trusts are not entitled to HRA, and recoveries of unauthorized payments can only be made prospectively from the date of UGC's clear direction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant House Rent Allowance University Grants Commission Staff Quarters Recovery of Excess Payment

Ravi v. Union of India & Ors.

29 Dec 1972 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:3164
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Banks Board Bureau lacks jurisdiction to conduct selections for Public Sector General Insurance Companies, quashing ACC circulars expanding its mandate and invalidating the impugned appointments.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Banks Board Bureau Public Sector General Insurance Companies Banking Companies Act, 1980 General Insurance Business Nationalisation Act, 1972

Vakamulla Chandrashekhar & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies

03 May 1972 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3915
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that subordinate courts lack jurisdiction to restore complaints dismissed for non-appearance, quashing the restoration and summons orders in a Companies Act offence case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant restoration of complaint functus officio non-appearance Section 482 CrPC