Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/S. RALSON (INDIA) LTD. v. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening notice under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 1990-91 due to lack of tangible material relating to that year and non-compliance with statutory requirements.
M/S VYSALI PHARMACEUITICALS LTD v. APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of a sick industrial company reference due to inordinate delay and held that unchallenged grounds before the appellate authority attain finality.
MASONIC CLUB (REGD) v. JAMNA LODGE
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the execution of a 1966 decree, holding it valid and binding despite objections under the Public Premises Act and reiterating the limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Asha Pal Gulati v. Central Board of Direct Taxes
The Delhi High Court held that waiver of penalty and interest under Section 273A of the Income Tax Act must be considered broadly excluding penalty and dues under Section 220, allowing the petitioner relief and remanding the matter for reconsideration.
Salma Wasil v. Nazar Shamsie & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s rejection of a belated amendment application seeking to retract admissions after trial commencement, emphasizing the principle of finality in pleadings and the requirement of due diligence under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.
Satnam Singh Pabla v. Delhi Power Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside the removal order of an employee due to violation of natural justice as inquiry notices were not served at his known foreign address, directing a fresh inquiry with proper notice.
Dinesh Kumar Meena v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the rejection of a candidate's appointment based on handwriting mismatch after forensic examination confirmed the handwriting matched, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.
Vijay Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing appointment of the candidate after forensic confirmation of thumb impression matching, overruling rejection based on handwriting/signature mismatch.
Yogesh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Tribunal's order rejecting candidature on handwriting mismatch after forensic thumb impression verification confirmed the petitioner's identity, directing his appointment with consequential benefits.
Dinesh Kumar Gurjar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside cancellation of candidature based on handwriting mismatch, relying on FSL thumb impression report and emphasizing the need for expert examination and adherence to natural justice.
Union of India v. Rakesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of candidature cancellation for minor OMR erasure, emphasizing adherence to recruitment instructions and binding coordinate bench precedent.
Priyanka Rani v. Government of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s candidature for Nursing Officer due to non-compliance with the prescribed validity period of OBC (NCL) certificates as mandated by the recruitment advertisement and official notices.
Kumer Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court mitigated a BSF employee's dismissal for overstaying leave and false information to reinstatement with penalty, emphasizing absence of mala fide intent and socio-economic context.
Pradeep Agarwal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where a plea of fraud was already taken in the original securitization application, amendment to add the same plea may be refused, but the party can clarify it in replication, and the Tribunal shall consider it on merits.
Southindian Bank Ltd v. Allindia Bank Deposit & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award revising fallback wages and benefits of daily Deposit Collectors employed by banks, affirming their status as workmen and the Tribunal's jurisdiction to fix fair wages reflecting cost of living and performance standards.
delivered on: 13th November, 2013 MAC.APP. No.414/2012 v. CORAM:
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by setting aside the counsel fee award, upheld 30% future prospects addition for a deceased aged 50 years and 4 days, and refused recovery rights against the driver due to lack of proof of licence invalidity.
Kalpana Mehdiratta v. Air Force Bal Bharati School
The Delhi High Court upheld the selection of respondent No.4 as Vice-Principal, ruling that the Departmental Promotion Committee's overall assessment of merit and seniority is not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or procedural irregularity.