Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Javed @ Galla Phad v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Jan 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:334

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable eyewitness identification, unexplained procedural delays, and failure to prove recovery of stolen articles beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 397 IPC robbery identification eyewitness testimony

Raju @Premi Lal v. Union of India

21 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:354

The Delhi High Court held that the Railway Claims Tribunal can regulate its own procedure and that the death of a claimant at the final arguments stage does not automatically invalidate the compensation award or cause abatement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Section 18 compensation award legal heirs

B.K. Bhagat v. New Delhi Municipal Council

21 Jan 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:358

The Delhi High Court held that the Estate Officer lacked jurisdiction to review a final order under the Public Premises Act, quashing the reopening of eviction proceedings initiated by NDMC after the limitation period for appeal had expired.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupant) Act, 1971 Estate Officer power of review final order

Sudha Rani v. State & Anr.

21 Jan 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:349

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case post-divorce, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the accused's entitlement to benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt rape mutual consent divorce fraud

Rahul Gupta v. Union of India

21 Jan 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:342

The Delhi High Court held that non-registration of an adoption deed is not a valid ground to refuse passport issuance, directing the passport authority to consider the application in accordance with law.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant passport issuance adoption deed registration Act 1908 fundamental right to travel

State v. Pappu Kumar

21 Jan 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:350

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused at the charge framing stage, holding that mere suspicion or old enmity without sufficient corroborative evidence is insufficient to frame charges under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge prima facie evidence discharge of accused Section 302 IPC

Director, Enforcement Directorate v. Maya Sanyal

21 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:335

The Delhi High Court held that exporters bear the burden to produce documentary evidence of surrendering export incentives under RBI’s conditional write-off approval, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after setting aside the Tribunal’s order allowing the exporters’ appeal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 export incentives unrealized export proceeds burden of proof

Director, Enforcement Directorate v. Maya Sanyal

21 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:340

The Delhi High Court held that exporters bear the burden to prove surrender of export incentives under RBI's conditional write-off approval and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication due to lack of documentary evidence.

criminal remanded Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 export incentives unrealized export proceeds Reserve Bank of India

Director, Enforcement Directorate v. Maya Sanyal

21 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:336

The Delhi High Court held that exporters bear the burden to prove surrender of export incentives under RBI's conditional write-off approval and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication due to lack of such evidence.

administrative remanded Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act export incentives unrealized export proceeds burden of proof

Veena v. State

21 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:337

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for wrongful confinement of a kidnapped child based on disclosure statements under Section 27 Evidence Act but acquitted on charges of employing the child for illicit purposes, reducing the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping wrongful confinement disclosure statement Section 27 Evidence Act

Veena v. State

21 Jan 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:338
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 368 IPC for wrongful confinement of a kidnapped child based on disclosure statements leading to recovery, acquitted on Section 373 IPC, and reduced sentences from seven to four years.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 368 IPC Section 373 IPC Section 27 Evidence Act disclosure statement

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (CHINA) LIMITED SHENZHEN BRANCH v. STATE BANK OF PATIALA & OTHERS

21 Jan 2014 · Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:341

The Delhi High Court held that a suit under Order XXXVII CPC based on a Standby Letter of Credit and Bill of Exchange is maintainable, not barred by limitation, and granted leave to defend where triable issues of egregious fraud exist.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Standby Letter of Credit Order XXXVII CPC Bill of Exchange Swift message

Kapil Gupta v. Punjab National Bank

21 Jan 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:339

The Delhi High Court allowed lease deeds to be taken on record and overruled objections to evidence recording based on Order 16 Rules 1 and 1-A CPC and Supreme Court precedents despite earlier court oversight.

civil other Significant Order 16 Rule 1 CPC Order 16 Rule 1-A CPC production of documents summoning witnesses

Ashish Kapoor v. Krishna Kumari

21 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:355

The Delhi Rent Control Act does not apply to an urbanized area without a specific notification under Section 1(2) of the Act, making landlord's suit for possession maintainable in civil court.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 urbanization notification Section 507 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act

Mustqeem v. Mohd. Yasin

21 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:343

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal against a possession decree under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, holding that procedural defects in plaint signature not raised earlier are curable and no substantial question of law arises.

civil appeal_dismissed Order 12 Rule 6 CPC possession suit landlord-tenant relationship Transfer of Property Act Section 106

State v. Pawan Kumar Pandey & Ors.

21 Jan 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:351-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a murder case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on incomplete circumstantial and last seen evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen evidence murder Section 302 IPC

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Ashwani Kumar & Ors.

21 Jan 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:356

The Delhi High Court upheld the Employees Commissioner's award granting compensation to the dependants of a truck driver murdered during the course of employment, holding that such murder constitutes an accident under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 accident murder course of employment

Kamal Sahdev v. M/S. Grid India Power Cables Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

21 Jan 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:357

The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of loan amount with interest against defendants who dishonoured post-dated cheques issued as security under a financial assistance agreement.

civil appeal_dismissed loan agreement post-dated cheque dishonour of cheque interest

Registrar of Companies v. Cyber Space Ltd.

21 Jan 2014 · R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:344

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to recall the winding-up order against Cyber Space Ltd., holding that lack of awareness due to incarceration does not justify setting aside the order when the company was duly served and represented.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant winding-up Companies Act, 1956 provisional liquidator recall of winding-up order

Ravinder Bagga v. Ved Prakash Tyagi

20 Jan 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:333

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide need for commercial use, holding that the tenant failed to raise triable issues to defend against summary eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide need eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend