Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Microsoft Corporation & Anr v. Kurapati Venkata Jagdeesh Babu & Anr

03 Feb 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:637

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Microsoft against defendants for infringing its well-known trademark 'MICROSOFT' through unauthorized use and domain registration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Well-known trademark Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 29

Suresh Kejriwal v. Special Director, Enforcement Directorate

03 Feb 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:639

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal of Suresh Kejriwal, setting aside penalty orders under FERA for lack of sufficient evidence implicating him in unauthorized foreign exchange transactions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act Section 9(1)(d) FERA Enforcement Directorate Burden of proof

Mitsubishi Corporation v. Director of Enforcement

03 Feb 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:641

The Delhi High Court held that a liaison office does not contravene Section 8(1) of FERA by disbursing salaries to expatriated employees of its foreign parent company and set aside the penalty imposed by the Enforcement Directorate.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 8(1) FERA liaison office expatriated employees

North Delhi Power Ltd v. Delhi State Electricity Workers Union & Ors.

03 Feb 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:653

The Delhi High Court restrained a trade union from striking in an essential electricity service without genuine grievance, holding such strike notices illegal and granting injunction to prevent public disruption.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant strike notice Section 22 Industrial Disputes Act essential services electricity distribution

CIT v. Jay Shree Gems & Jewellery

03 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:658-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee’s entitlement to deduction under Section 10A for jewellery manufacturing via job work, validated admission of additional evidence under Rule 46A, and allowed designing and fabrication expenses, dismissing the Revenue’s appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act manufacturing definition job work additional evidence

CIT v. Jay Shree Gems & Jewellery

03 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:656-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to Section 10A deductions for jewellery manufacturing via job work and allowed related expenses, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act manufacturing job work export deduction

CIT v. Jay Shree Gems & Jewellery

03 Feb 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:657-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's entitlement to deduction under Section 10A for jewellery manufacturing via job work, validated admission of additional evidence, and allowed related expenses, dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 10A Income Tax Act manufacturing job work export deduction

K.L. Bhasin v. Punjab National Bank

03 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:654

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a bank officer due to failure of the enquiry officer to return findings on all charges and converted the punishment to compulsory retirement considering delay and acquittal in criminal proceedings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings enquiry officer findings natural justice punishment modification

Union of India v. Kalimata Ispat India (P) Ltd.

03 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:646

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal and upheld the arbitral award fixing MODVAT benefits at a contractually agreed rate, holding that such fixed amounts cannot be altered without contractual modification.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 MODVAT benefits

Dr. Neelam Bhalla v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:648

The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's order denying disciplinary action and compensation under the RTI Act against an exempted organization, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory exemptions and limited judicial interference.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 24 exemption Central Information Commission disciplinary action

Gopal v. State of Delhi

03 Feb 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:647

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for gang rape, holding that the victim's credible testimony and corroborative medical evidence suffice for conviction despite minor discrepancies and delay in FIR.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape victim testimony delay in FIR minor contradictions Section 376(2)(g) IPC

N.C. Bansal v. Board of Discipline of ICAI

03 Feb 2014 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:643-DB

The Delhi High Court held that no oral hearing is required before forming a prima facie opinion in disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act, and the Court will not interfere with the Institute's decision absent procedural irregularity.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Chartered Accountants Act 1949 Board of Discipline Director (Discipline) professional misconduct

Vimla Devi & Ors. v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.

03 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:645

The Delhi High Court allowed partial early withdrawal of compensation fixed deposit by elderly petitioners on grounds of financial hardship, while safeguarding the balance amount.

civil petition_allowed compensation fixed deposit receipt early withdrawal financial hardship

Anand @ Jat v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi

03 Feb 2014 · S. P. Garg · 2014:DHC:642

The Delhi High Court modified convictions and sentences in a robbery case by substituting Section 307 IPC with Section 326 IPC due to lack of intent to cause death, upheld Section 397 IPC applicability based on grievous injuries caused by a deadly weapon, and set aside the fine under Section 397 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery grievous hurt deadly weapon Section 397 IPC

DR. MUKESH AGGARWAL v. RAM CHANDER

03 Feb 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:655

The High Court held that summoning requires sufficient prima facie material and reasonable nexus, upheld summoning of one accused while rejecting summoning of others due to lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant summoning of accused Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 120-B IPC criminal conspiracy

Union of India v. Ram Chander Decd. Thr. Lr Maina Devi

03 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:651

The Delhi High Court held that an accident on a public road using private transport while returning from duty does not arise out of employment and that an inordinate delay in filing compensation claims cannot be condoned without sufficient grounds.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 arising out of and in the course of employment condonation of delay limitation period

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sarita Mishra

03 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:650

The Delhi High Court held that an employee driving a vehicle with a valid license at employer’s direction is covered under the Employee’s Compensation Act, and an insurance company failing to appear below cannot challenge liability on appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 driver definition insurance company liability ex parte proceedings

Manorma Grover & Others v. Ishwari Devi G+

03 Feb 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:649

The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit based on an amicable settlement with an agreed payment schedule for the plaintiffs' share in a DDA flat.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit consent decree property valuation payment schedule

Maya Devi v. State (NCT) of Delhi

03 Feb 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:636

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a mother-in-law for dowry death based on a reliable dying declaration and corroborative evidence, while reducing her sentence from ten to seven years.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 304B IPC dowry death Section 113B Evidence Act

M/S SAINI CONSTRUCTIONS COMPANY v. DELHI JAL BOARD

03 Feb 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:1053

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful rescission of a government contract and imposition of penalty where the contractor failed to perform within stipulated time and breached contractual obligations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contract rescission time is of the essence penalty clause performance guarantee