Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

State Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Rajan @ Raja

28 Feb 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:1122-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to insufficient and inconsistent prosecution evidence, procedural lapses, and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder acquittal eyewitness testimony

Menka Devi & Ors. v. Union of India

28 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1117

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the dependants of a deceased bonafide passenger who died after falling from a train, holding Railways strictly liable under the Railways Act despite conflicting evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Railways Act 1989 strict liability compensation

Sandeep Chopra v. M/S. Fashionite Impex Pvt. Ltd.

28 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1121

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to grant the appellant salary for 26 days worked, set aside heavy costs imposed by the appellate court, and decreed the suit with interest.

civil appeal_allowed salary recovery admission in written statement costs imposed employee rights

Acorus Unitech Wireless Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

28 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:1106-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer's reasons were based on tangible material and procedural compliance was met, dismissing the petition challenging non-disclosure of confidential documents and timing of notice issuance.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 147 Section 148 Reassessment notice

CISCO FINANCIAL ADVISORY (INDIA) v. DIVIJ INFRAPROJECT (P) LTD

28 Feb 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:1126

The Delhi High Court granted a summary decree for recovery of Rs. 59,80,000/- with interest against a defendant who failed to appear in a suit based on dishonored post-dated cheques under Order XXXVII CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Order XXXVII CPC summary suit dishonored cheque Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Devender Kumar Sehgal

28 Feb 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:1108

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that termination for unauthorized absence due to illness was harsh and directed discharge with retirement benefits.

labor petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized absence termination medical condition disciplinary action

Nippon Soda Co. Ltd. v. V.P. Goyal & Anr.

28 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1123

The Delhi High Court held that pendency of rectification proceedings before the Registrar or IPAB mandates stay of trademark infringement suits under Section 124(1)(i) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, regardless of timing, and the suit cannot be split between infringement and passing off claims.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 124 rectification proceedings stay of suit

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Ajeet Singh @ Jeet Singh & Ors.

28 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1115

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation including 27% functional disability and Rs. 2,00,000/- for non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim functional disability compensation non-pecuniary damages

Devagiri Farms Pvt Ltd v. Sanjay Kapur & Anr

28 Feb 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:756-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the appellant from using a deceptively similar trade dress in tea packaging, emphasizing that overall packaging similarity can cause consumer deception despite prominent trademarks.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trade dress packaging similarity likelihood of deception interim injunction

Ravi Kumar @ Mangoo v. State

27 Feb 2014 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:1972
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ravi Kumar @ Mangoo for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304(1) IPC, relying on cogent testimony of related witnesses and medical evidence, while reducing his sentence from 10 to 7 years.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304(1) IPC Section 302 IPC related witnesses self-defense

K.K. Verma v. C.B.I.

26 Feb 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:1076

The Delhi High Court held that conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act should not be stayed during appeal except in exceptional cases, dismissing the appellant's plea to suspend conviction to avoid dismissal from service.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act stay of conviction Section 389 CrPC corruption charges

Sathya Sai Medical College & Research Institute v. Union of India & Anr

26 Feb 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:1094-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Medical Council of India’s recommendation to return a medical college’s postgraduate course scheme is not final and that the Central Government must provide a hearing before disapproval, rendering a writ petition against the MCI’s recommendation premature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A postgraduate medical courses

SHEEL KUMAR GOYAL v. SURENDER KUMAR SHARMA

26 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1095

The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 applies to Village Uldhanpur as part of Municipal Committee Delhi-Shahdara, barring civil court jurisdiction over eviction and rent recovery suits in that area.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Municipal Committee Delhi-Shahdara Village Uldhanpur Section 50 jurisdiction

Nand Lal v. State

26 Feb 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:1096-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence despite hostile witnesses and minor discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder hostile witnesses seizure memos

Narcotics Control Bureau v. Praveen Dua & Ors.

26 Feb 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:1085
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an NDPS case, ruling that mere possession of psychotropic drugs without proof of illegal export and corroborated voluntary confession is insufficient for conviction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act psychotropic substances illegal export Section 67 statement

Rajesh Kumar v. Bhagwanti & Ors.

26 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1090

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding concurrent findings that the appellant had no tenancy rights and must hand over possession to the respondents.

civil appeal_dismissed second appeal concurrent findings tenancy rights defense struck off

Manjit Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Feb 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1077-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Summary Court Martial conviction and penalty of an army personnel for wilfully abandoning guard duty and facilitating a prisoner's escape, affirming the validity of the trial authority and charges under the Army Act.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Army Act, 1950 Summary Court Martial Section 36(d) Section 49(b)

Tilak Raj Gogia v. BSNL

26 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1087

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award and held that Section 33 of the Arbitration Act is only for clerical corrections and cannot be used as a review, dismissing the appeal challenging the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 33 Section 34 Section 37

Komal Singh & Anr. v. Union of India

26 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · DHC:1086 1989

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for a death occurring while crossing railway tracks, affirming the burden of proof on claimants to establish bonafide passenger status and condemning misuse of legal process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 untoward incident bonafide passenger

Organizing Committee Commonwealth Games v. M/S Nussli (Switzerland) Ltd

26 Feb 2014 · Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:1080
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s Section 9 petition directing the respondent to keep the performance bank guarantee alive pending challenge to the arbitral award under Section 34, distinguishing the Bombay High Court precedent on facts.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act performance bank guarantee interim relief arbitral award challenge