Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

M/S Comfort Living Hotels P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-III

10 Mar 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:1317-DB

The Delhi High Court held that expenses enhancing existing business capacity without creating new assets are revenue expenditure deductible for income tax, and depreciation on temporary constructions is allowable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant revenue expenditure capital expenditure depreciation temporary construction

State NCT of Delhi v. Surender Kumar Jain

10 Mar 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:1320

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act due to unexplained discrepancies in the sample description and consent for prosecution, emphasizing that acquittals should not be disturbed absent patent perversity.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act misbranding sodium benzoate sodium bejoate

State v. Mahinder Prakash

10 Mar 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:1321
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a mustard oil seller due to significant unexplained discrepancies between expert reports on adulteration, emphasizing that such discrepancies create reasonable doubt and that appeals against acquittal require patent illegality.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Section 13(2) Public Analyst report Central Food Laboratory report

Abhishek Yadav v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd

10 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:1322

The Delhi High Court held that a PGDM qualification recognized as equivalent to an MBA by the AIU satisfies eligibility for appointment, allowing the petitioner’s writ petition for appointment as Administrative Officer in the OBC category.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant PGDM equivalence MBA degree Association of Indian Universities Administrative Officer recruitment

Paragon Cable Company v. Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi

10 Mar 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:1318-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the Revenue's valuation method of seized copper cables, holding that factual findings and valuation methodology do not warrant interference absent a substantial question of law.

tax appeal_dismissed Central Excise valuation of seized goods weight calculation Small Scale Industries exemption

Pushpa & Ors. v. S Gurbaksh Singh & Ors.

10 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2014:DHC:1313

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal in a motor accident claim by setting aside contributory negligence against the deceased, enhancing compensation based on skilled wages and non-pecuniary damages, and directing the insurer to pay the balance amount with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence compensation Minimum Wages Act

AVCO TRADERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS. v. SANDEEP ENTERPRISES

10 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1315

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award for sale of goods, limited judicial interference under Section 34, and set aside personal liability of directors due to lack of evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 arbitral award

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. M/S. SHEESH MAHAL RESTAURANT

10 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1314

The Delhi High Court held that remanding an original proceeding under Section 75 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act at the stage of final arguments after prolonged trial is impermissible and directed the ESI Court to decide the matter on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 75 Section 82 original proceedings

M/S GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA v. PRASANTA GHOSH & ANR

10 Mar 2014 · G.S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:1330

The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction over a loan recovery suit and granted conditional leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC subject to deposit of 50% of the claimed amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend loan agreement

Ram Kumar & Ors. v. State

10 Mar 2014 · Veena Birbal · 2014:DHC:1300

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for attempted murder and house trespass based on reliable injured witness testimony and medical evidence, while reducing their sentence considering trial duration and health.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant injured witness testimony Section 307 IPC grievous hurt common intention

Microsoft Corporation & Anr. v. Karan Puri Prop. of M/s Puri Computers

10 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1329

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against unauthorized hard-disk loading of Microsoft software, affirming copyright infringement and endorsing punitive damages in ex-parte proceedings.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant copyright infringement computer software hard-disk loading permanent injunction

Mohd. Shahid Khan @ Raja v. State

10 Mar 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:1312:DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the life conviction of Mohd. Shahid Khan for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, including a voluntary extra judicial confession and recovery of the weapon, rejecting the appellant's challenges on motive, timing, and procedural delays.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession recovery of weapon murder

Mr. V.K. Malik, Mr. Jagdeep Sharma, Mr. Rahul Raj Mehra & Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates. v. STATE .....

10 Mar 2014 · JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR · 2014:DHC:1298

The Delhi High Court acquitted accused public servants and others of corruption charges due to insufficient evidence and invalid sanction for prosecution, emphasizing the necessity of specific charges and proper application of mind in sanction orders.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 sanction for prosecution criminal conspiracy illegal gratification

B.R. Arora & Associates (P) Ltd. v. Airport Authority of India

10 Mar 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:2336
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court corrected arithmetical errors and set aside parts of an arbitral award for lack of reasons and inconsistency, allowing fresh arbitration on certain claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 33 correction Section 34 challenge arbitral award

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S IRB Ahmedabad Vadodara Super Express Tollways Pvt. Ltd

10 Mar 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:8034
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's post-award Section 9 petition seeking interim deposit of ₹1586 crore awarded against IRB, holding such relief requires exceptional circumstances beyond mere award existence and apprehensions about respondent's financial condition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act post-award interim relief arbitral award enforcement premium deferment scheme

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S. Lanco Infratech Ltd.

07 Mar 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:1272-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting MoRTH contract specifications to allow riverbed aggregates and dismissed the appellant's challenge under limited grounds of section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 MoRTH specifications

Dalip Kumar @ Albeli v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

07 Mar 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:1290-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, while modifying the sentence relating to fine default period.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder conviction hostile witnesses post-mortem report

G.P. Sharma v. Hari Shankar Sharma

07 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1291

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that constructive possession under a valid agreement to sell entitles him to half ownership and possession of the property under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, rejecting the respondent's plea of illegality under Section 23 of the Contract Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 53A Transfer of Property Act agreement to sell constructive possession Section 23 Contract Act

M/S.PARTI FIBERS PVT. LTD. v. Saroj Chawla & Anr.

07 Mar 2014 · V.K. Shali · 2014:DHC:1289

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness, willingness, and ability to perform the contract despite admitted agreement to sell.

civil appeal_dismissed specific performance readiness and willingness agreement to sell liquidity

Gautam Kapoor & Anr. v. Tanya Kapoor & Anr.

07 Mar 2014 · V.K. Shali · 2014:DHC:1292

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for permanent injunction and declaration for lack of locus standi and cause of action, holding that the plaintiffs had no legal right in the petrol pump license held solely by their mother.

civil petition_dismissed locus standi cause of action permanent injunction Army War Widow Quota