Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

IREO PVT. LTD. v. MR. MAHENDER ARORA & ORS.

14 Mar 2014 · JAYANT NATH

The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' use of a deceptively similar trade mark violated an interim injunction and prima facie constituted contempt, directing further proceedings.

civil other Significant interim injunction trade mark infringement deceptively similar mark contempt of court

Court on its Own Motion v. State

14 Mar 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:1432-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the State and related authorities to improve infrastructure, ensure timely payments, and fill vacancies for public prosecutors to uphold the statutory duty of effective criminal prosecution.

criminal other Significant public prosecutors infrastructure timely payment government counsels

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. M/S United India Periodicals P. Ltd.

14 Mar 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:1430

Provident fund contributions under the EPF Act are payable only when wages are actually paid or adjudicated as payable, and not during a lock-out period where wages remain unpaid and the lock-out is not declared illegal or unjustified.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act lock-out basic wages provident fund contributions

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sundari

14 Mar 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:1431

Termination of a fixed-term daily wage contract does not constitute retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, and procedural safeguards under Sections 25-G and 25-H do not apply, rendering reinstatement with back wages unwarranted.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 retrenchment fixed-term contract daily wage worker

Master Aman v. Mehrban & Ors.

14 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1444

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation from Rs. 72,500 to Rs. 3,38,500 for a child's 22% permanent disability in a motor vehicle accident, applying Supreme Court guidelines on compensation assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation permanent disability motor vehicle accident child injury

Suresh Chand Purwar v. Vivek Purwar & Ors.

14 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1440

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be returned on disputed factual grounds of territorial jurisdiction without evidence and allowed the appeal setting aside the trial court's order returning the plaint.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 7 Rule 10 CPC territorial jurisdiction trademark infringement passing off

Grant Thornton India LLP v. Resolution Capital Global Pvt. Ltd.

14 Mar 2014 · R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:1441

The Delhi High Court held that refusal to accept a statutory demand notice at the registered office constitutes valid service under section 434(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956, and dismissed the application to recall the ex-parte order appointing a provisional liquidator.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant statutory demand notice section 434(1)(a) Companies Act 1956 registered office

Kirti Uppal v. Sheela Arora

14 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1442

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against an arbitral award for possession, holding that jurisdictional objections not raised before the arbitrator are waived and the arbitrator validly decided the rent dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction objection Section 34 arbitration award challenge Section 37 appeal

Ashok Kumar v. State

14 Mar 2014 · Reva Khetrapal; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:1429-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, holding that the prosecution proved intentional bodily injury causing death but not premeditated murder.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC culpable homicide not amounting to murder intention to cause bodily injury hostile witnesses

M/S Dewan Chand Ram Chandra Industries P. Ltd. v. Union of India

14 Mar 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:1424-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a company operating work over rigs is an industrial undertaking engaged in mining under Section 10(15)(iv)(c) of the Income Tax Act, entitling it to tax exemption on interest payments for foreign currency loans.

tax appeal_allowed Significant industrial undertaking engaged in mining Section 10(15)(iv)(c) Income Tax Act 1961

Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-XVI v. S.S. Ahluwalia

14 Mar 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:1423-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that assessment orders passed without valid transfer of jurisdiction under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act are void ab initio, affirming the necessity of proper jurisdictional transfer for valid income tax assessments.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Jurisdiction Section 127 Assessment orders

Dayal Chand @ Dal Chand v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi

14 Mar 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:1425

The Delhi High Court affirmed the conviction under Section 308 IPC for causing grievous injuries but modified the sentence considering mitigating factors and the period already undergone in custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 308 IPC grievous injury conviction sentence modification

Shibu Semol v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

14 Mar 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:1426

The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder but modified the sentence considering time served, good conduct, and mitigating factors, directing compensation to the victim.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 452 IPC Section 307 IPC Section 506 IPC sentence modification

IREO PVT. LTD. v. GENESIS INFRATECH PVT. LTD.

14 Mar 2014 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:1427

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant's use of 'Genesis SKYON' mark, holding it deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered 'IREO SKYON' mark and rejecting defendant's defenses based on common descriptive words and partial mark use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trade mark infringement deceptive similarity Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 17 Trade Marks Act

Mohd. Nafees v. Mohd. Imran Ismail

14 Mar 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:1428

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking prosecution for filing a false affidavit in election nomination papers, holding that without a complaint by the Election Commissioner, the courts lack jurisdiction under Section 195(1)(a) CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 195 CrPC false affidavit election nomination Notary Public

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SMT HAZRA BEGUM & ORS.

14 Mar 2014 · SURESH KAIT · 2014:DHC:1415

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation based on the deceased's notional income assessed from his educational qualifications and potential earning capacity, dismissing the insurer's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal compensation notional income educational qualifications

New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Manmaya & Ors

14 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1416

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, reducing the compensation awarded under Section 166 to the statutory limits under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A Section 166 compensation

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK v. RAGHUBIR SARAN CHARITABLE TRUST

14 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1421-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a lease deed expressly prohibiting assignment or subletting does not permit transfer of tenancy rights by amalgamation without clear consent of the lessor, and dismissed the Bank's appeal while allowing the Trust's appeal for possession.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease deed assignment subletting amalgamation

Standard Chartered Bank v. Raghubir Saran Charitable Trust

14 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1418-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an express prohibition on assignment or subletting in a lease deed overrides general recitals, and that amalgamation without clear consent from the lessor constitutes prohibited subletting, allowing the Trust's suit for possession.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease deed assignment subletting amalgamation

M/S. ASHIANA CARGO SERVICES v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (I&G)

14 Mar 2014 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; R.V. EASWAR · 2014:DHC:1413-DB

The Delhi High Court held that revocation of a Customs House Agent license must be proportionate to the violation, setting aside revocation where no mens rea or active facilitation was found and reinstating the license.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations revocation of license proportionality doctrine mens rea