Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Kirpal Singh v. Navdeep Kaur and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant by denying leave to defend where the landlord demonstrated bona fide residential need without suitable alternative accommodation.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed a delayed Section 6 land acquisition declaration issued beyond the statutory time limit, affirming that quashing does not reset the one-year period for acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the prescribed period after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, affirming that no fresh one-year period is granted post-quashing under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the prescribed one-year period after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, quashing the acquisition notifications and allowing the petitioners' writ petitions.
Vaishno Devi v. Suraj Bhan
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, holding that the landlord's bonafide need was genuine and the tenant failed to raise any triable issue under Section 25-B of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory time limit after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, affirming that no fresh one-year period is granted post-quashing under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory time limit after excluding court stay periods is invalid, quashing the acquisition notifications for the petitioners' lands.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory time limit after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, quashing the acquisition notification and allowing the writ petitions.
Mahender Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 326 IPC, holding that serious non-compoundable offences cannot be quashed merely on compromise between parties under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Manoj Madhwan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that only the registered owner or person in charge of a vehicle can be held liable under Section 5/181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and quashed summons against an employee who was not the owner.
Overnite Real Estate Private Limited v. BMC Properties Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, affirming the court's supervisory role and upholding the transfer of all liabilities to the transferee company.
Gurubachan Singh Sodhi v. M/S. HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord's appeal seeking direction for rent deposit, holding that rent liability depends on actual delivery of possession and no admission of rent liability was made to invoke Order 39 Rule 10 CPC.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the prescribed one-year period after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, affirming the binding precedent that no fresh one-year period is granted post-quashing.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory time limit after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, affirming that no fresh one-year period is granted post-quashing under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory period after quashing of an earlier declaration is invalid, quashing the acquisition notification and allowing the petitioners' writ petitions.
Sunil Goel & Others v. The State and Others
The Delhi High Court held that a Section 6 declaration issued beyond the statutory one-year period, after excluding court stay periods, is invalid, quashing the acquisition notification and upholding the principle from Padmasundara Rao.
Saleem @ Pinni v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants accused of armed robbery due to failure of prosecution to prove recovery of stolen cash beyond reasonable doubt and absence of eyewitness identification.
Mool Chand Khairati Ram Trust v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that executive orders mandating free treatment for hospitals without statutory or contractual basis violate fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(g) and 300A and cannot be imposed unilaterally.
Shri Mahender Singh & Ors. v. Shri Dharam Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a female bhumidhar's life estate converts into an absolute estate under the Hindu Succession Act, validating her relinquishment deed despite prior restrictions under the Delhi Land Reforms Act.
Roop Singh v. Roshan Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the second appeal holding that a family settlement exhibited without objection and signed by all parties is duly proved and binding, entitling the appellant to ownership and possession rights in the disputed property.