Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Respondent No.1
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employee’s Compensation Act, upholding the Commissioner’s award of compensation based on minimum wages including food allowance and rejecting procedural and evidentiary objections.
Harsha Capital Services Ltd v. Ravinder Kaur Narang
The High Court upheld the conversion of a summary suit under Order 37 CPC into a regular suit due to lack of clear admission of liability and disputed factual issues requiring trial.
Palm Greens Infrastructures Private Limited & Ors. v. Arcon Properties Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents.
Imperia Homes Pvt Ltd v. Imperia Structures Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed a Scheme of Amalgamation between a wholly owned subsidiary and its holding company, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, where no rights were affected and no new shares issued.
Jasjiv Singh Anand v. Office of Commissioner of Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed contempt proceedings for non-compliance with its order, holding that pending an application for recall/modification, contempt cannot be initiated.
V.K. Shamra v. State Farms Corporation of India Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the retirement of an employee under statutory rules after finding sufficient material and no mala fide in the decision, limiting judicial review to the presence of valid basis.
Triumphant Institute of Management Education v. Time Coaching/Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' use of the mark 'TIME' and domain name www.timeforedu.com infringed the plaintiff's well-known trademark 'T.I.M.E', granted injunction, damages, and ordered cancellation of the infringing domain.
M/S COMPLETE DEWATERING SYSTEMS PVT LTD v. M/S DSC LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement due to insufficient grounds and decreed the suit for recovery in favor of the plaintiff.
PepsiCo Inc & Anr. v. Aqua Mineral (India) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to PepsiCo for infringement of its registered trademark and copyright in AQUAFINA against defendants using the deceptively similar mark AQUAFINE.
Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Nath Memorial Educational Society
The Delhi High Court held that a notification exempting certain educational and social welfare institutions from additional FAR charges operates retrospectively, entitling those who paid under protest to refunds with interest.
Rama Kant Jindal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of security deposit and expenditure ceiling provisions under the Representation of People Act, 1951, affirming that the right to contest elections is a statutory right subject to reasonable conditions prescribed by law.
Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Nath Memorial Educational Society
The Delhi High Court held that a notification exempting educational and social welfare societies from additional FAR charges operates retrospectively, entitling those who paid charges under protest to refunds with interest.
Delhi Development Authority v. Jagan Nath Memorial Educational Society
The Delhi High Court held that the notification exempting educational and social welfare institutions from additional FAR charges applies retrospectively, entitling those who paid under protest to refunds with interest.
Dinesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the petitioner’s conviction for murder by a General Security Force Court, holding that procedural rules were complied with and the evidence conclusively established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Sh. Nathi Lal & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of a compensation claim for death due to an alleged train accident, holding that the claim lacked credible evidence and proof of passenger status.
M/S. BIHAR CARRYING CO. PVT. LTD. v. M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that unsubstantiated claims of counsel's absence and unexplained delay do not justify reopening ex parte proceedings.
Union of India v. Vikram Bahadur Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to a passenger injured after falling from an overcrowded moving train, affirming the Railway's liability under the Railways Act, 1989.
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) v. Naushad & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 304 Part I and 308 IPC, affirming that injuries caused in a sudden fight without premeditation attract Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing murder charges to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Amna v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in an acid attack case due to lack of evidence proving her involvement in conspiracy with the co-accused, emphasizing the necessity of clear and corroborated proof for conspiracy convictions.
Jagdish Prasad Aggarwal and Anr. v. Shashi Jain
The court upheld the Trial Court's order directing the defendant to lead evidence first in a possession suit, holding that the onus shifts to the defendant when the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case by a registered sale deed.