Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
MD IFTEKHAR v. M/S KARIM HOTELS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining use of the trademark "KARIM'S", holding that trademark registration confers prima facie ownership entitling interim relief despite allegations of suppression in registration proceedings.
Soni Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for assault and obstruction of excise officers acting in discharge of official duties, emphasizing that injuries causing bodily pain constitute 'hurt' and that absence of written information does not vitiate prosecution.
Soni Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for assault and obstruction of Excise officers acting in discharge of duty, while granting leniency through bonds and compensation to first-time offenders.
Ramkaran Thr. Parokar Sushila v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of Section 308 IPC charges due to lack of intent to cause death but convicted them under Section 323 IPC and granted probation considering the victim's forgiveness and circumstances.
Raghubir Singh v. Jagdish Chand
Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by applying 50% future prospects, multiplier based on deceased's age, and increased non-pecuniary damages for loss of love and funeral expenses.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Riyasat Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurance company is initially liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants even if the driver was a minor and unlicensed, with the insurer entitled to recover the amount from the insured or driver thereafter.
Ashok Yadav v. Mary Karuna Pushpa Teresa Toppo & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's premature objections in execution proceedings, emphasizing the necessity of accurate property description under Order XXI CPC and granting liberty to raise bona fide objections if coercive action is taken.
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD v. TEJPAL SINGH
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing compensation after deducting conveyance allowance and upheld the multiplier based on the deceased's age, clarifying principles for assessing motor accident compensation.
Arshi Irshad v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Section 324 IPC, holding that at the charge stage, the court need only form a prima facie view without evaluating evidence.
Soni Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for assault and obstruction of Excise officers discharging official duties, emphasizing that minor injuries constitute 'hurt' and non-recording of information does not invalidate prosecution.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Gian Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner’s award of compensation with interest from 30 days after the accident, rejecting the appellant’s challenge on disability assessment and interest calculation under the Employee’s Compensation Act.
Union of India v. Gautam Anand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Railway Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to a passenger who fell from a train due to an 'untoward incident', holding that mere negligence does not absolve Railways from liability under the Railways Act, 1989.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dev Raj Joshi
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for total disablement at 100% where the employee was incapacitated from performing his previous work as a driver following an occupational accident.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Ashok Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting interest on delayed payments, including compound interest, rejecting the appellant's objections and emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
Dharmender v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for robbery but modified the sentence considering his custody period and mitigating factors.
Mukesh @ Mukka v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant’s conviction for robbery and criminal conspiracy, set aside the conviction under Section 397 IPC, and reduced the sentence considering the period already served.
M/S. JAGDAMBA IMPEX v. M/S. TRISTAR PRODUCTS PRIVATE LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that copyright in industrial drawings ceases after fifty articles are produced industrially under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, setting aside an injunction against use of a similar machine and dismissing the plaintiff's copyright claim.
Ramkaran Thr. Parokar Sushila v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of Section 308 IPC charges due to lack of grievous hurt but convicted them under Section 323 IPC and granted probation considering victim's forgiveness and circumstances.
Babu Ram v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a municipal employee for demanding and accepting a bribe, rejecting his defense of a legitimate transaction and affirming the applicability of Section 20 presumption under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Microsoft Corporation & Anr. v. Prithviraj & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Microsoft for copyright infringement by defendants who sold computers pre-loaded with pirated Microsoft software.