Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Dinesh Kumar v. Hari Shankar & Anr
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for future medical expenses and future loss of earnings in a motor accident claim involving permanent disability, emphasizing inclusion of future income prospects.
Sanskriti Infracon Private Limited v. Earthcon Universal Infratech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Sanskriti Infracon Private Limited and Earthcon Universal Infratech Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after addressing valuation discrepancies and modifying the appointed date.
Nazim Khan alias Guddu v. State
The Delhi High Court held that conviction based solely on dock identification without corroboration is unsafe, refusal to participate in test identification parade is justified if accused was pre-shown to witness, and acquitted the appellant of robbery charges while upholding possession of stolen property conviction.
Bimla Devi v. Chairman, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that IOCL cannot unilaterally amend its welfare scheme to exclude married daughters from employment eligibility and directed it to consider the petitioner’s daughter for employment under the scheme provisions in force at the time of the employee’s death.
Shri Satpal v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the probate appeal as not pressed following the final dismissal of related possession suits, allowing revival if the civil court judgment is set aside.
Union of India v. Sanjeev Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Railway's appeal, affirming that the Railways are liable to pay compensation for the death of a bonafide passenger who died due to accidental fall from the train.
P.R Sivanandan Nair v. Saipem India Projects Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that foreign parent and shareholder companies are not necessary parties to a suit against their Indian subsidiary and dismissed the plaintiff's application to issue summons to them under Order V Rule 11 CPC.
Parmeshwar Ram & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held the Railways strictly liable to pay compensation for the death of a passenger who fell from a running train, setting aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the claim.
Naresh Kumar Verma v. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-XII
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeals and writ petitions, upholding the Income Tax authorities' orders and reaffirming limited judicial interference in tax assessments.
Naresh Kumar Verma v. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-XII
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's tax appeals and writ petitions, upholding the Income Tax authorities' orders based on principles established in ITA 1004/2011.
Naresh Kumar Verma v. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-XII
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeals and writ petitions, upholding the Income Tax authorities' orders and confirming the tax demands as legally valid.
Naresh Kumar Verma v. CIT
The Delhi High Court upheld penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate claim of Section 10B exemption, holding statutory conditions of export and foreign exchange receipt mandatory and not modifiable by external policies.
LT FOODS LIMITED v. HERITAGE FOODS (INDIA) LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the plaint alleging trademark infringement and passing off could not be returned for lack of territorial jurisdiction where the plaint contained clear averments that the cause of action arose within the court's jurisdiction.
M/S FEDERAL MOTORS PVT LTD v. M/S ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Appellate Court's power to enhance use and occupation charges pending eviction appeal, holding such interlocutory orders modifiable and not barred by res judicata or merger.
Neena Devi & Ors. v. Ashok Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced motor accident compensation by including all family-beneficial income components and increasing non-pecuniary damages for loss of consortium and love and affection in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Sh. Sohan Pal v. Sh. Umashankar & Anr.
The Delhi Rent Control Act does not apply to the suit premises in Sagarpur, village Dabri, due to absence of a specific notification, and hence civil courts have jurisdiction to try the possession suit.
M/S. ECONOMIC TRANSPORT ORGANIZATION v. DHARMENDRA MISHRA
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award directing reinstatement at Delhi, holding that an employee has no right to insist on posting without a valid transfer and that abandonment requires inquiry, ordering a monetary settlement instead.
Raj Kumar Sharma v. P.O. Industrial Tribunal No. 1 and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Industrial Tribunal in Delhi had jurisdiction to adjudicate the industrial dispute despite the cause of action arising partly in Uttar Pradesh, setting aside the Tribunal's order of lack of jurisdiction and remanding the matter for merits.
Delhi Stock Exchange Assocn. Ltd. v. Ujala Leasing Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interest accrued on a refundable deposit made by a prospective purchaser in a court-ordered property sale belongs to the depositor when the accepted bid is less than the deposit amount.
MUMTAZ v. STATE GNCT OF DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail in a dowry harassment case, holding that bail cannot be cancelled without actual proof of violation or interference with justice.