Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

State of NCT of Delhi v. Ravi Sejwal & Anr

11 May 2014 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:9362-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt through circumstantial evidence and procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory call detail records recovery of weapon

Munavvar-Ul-Islam v. Rishu Arora @ Rukhsar

09 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2473-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that apostasy by a Muslim woman ipso facto dissolves marriage under Muslim personal law, and Section 4 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, does not abrogate this rule but requires a decree for dissolution, validating the Family Court’s divorce decree granted without full trial.

family appeal_dismissed Significant apostasy Muslim personal law Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 Section 4

Pankaj Bajaj v. Meenakshi Sharma & Ors.

09 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2498

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of the suit under Order VII Rule 11, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action requiring trial regarding disputed title and possession of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 cause of action land acquisition possession

Jai Narain Malik v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi

09 May 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:2495
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police officer for rape, holding that credible testimony of the victim and satisfactory explanation for delay in FIR suffice for conviction even without medical evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape delay in FIR testimony of prosecutrix corroboration

Mohd. Zulfikar Ali v. Commissioner under the Employees Compensation Act & Ors.

09 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2499

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a casual worker is not a 'workman' under the Employees' Compensation Act and that a claim filed beyond the two-year limitation period without condonation is barred.

labor appeal_dismissed Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 workman definition casual employment burden of proof

Ajay Kumar Gupta v. Union of India

09 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2500

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation for injury caused by a stone thrown from outside the train, holding the claimant failed to prove a violent attack under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

civil appeal_dismissed Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 Section 123(c) violent attack

Association of Self Financing Institutions v. Guru Govind Singh Indraprastha University

09 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2492-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutionality of mandatory common entrance test admissions for private unaided institutions under the Delhi Professional Colleges Act, balancing institutional autonomy with the State's duty to ensure merit and educational excellence.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Common Entrance Test Article 19(1)(g) Private unaided educational institutions Admission regulation

Sandeep Jaidka v. Mukesh Mittal & Anr

09 May 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:2494

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application in a patent infringement suit concerning a 4D effects device, holding that the defendants raised credible challenges to patent validity and non-infringement based on differing synchronization methods.

intellectual_property petition_dismissed Significant patent infringement 4D theatre coded signals synchronization

Inderjeet Singh & Ors. v. State

09 May 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:2493-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions based on reliable eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence despite challenges on delay in FIR and recovery procedures.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Eyewitness testimony Delay in FIR Recovery of weapon

Birlasoft Technologies Ltd. v. Birlasoft Enterprises Ltd. & Ors.

09 May 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:2510

The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of Birlasoft companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring statutory compliance and absence of objections.

corporate petition_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 Foreign Exchange Management Act

Anil Sood v. The State & Anr

09 May 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:2505

The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate must exercise judicial discretion and not mechanically order police investigation under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., dismissing the petition seeking such investigation in a partnership dispute involving allegations of criminal breach of trust and cheating.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. police investigation Magistrate discretion cognizable offence

M.L. Baghel v. State/NCT of Delhi

09 May 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:2506

The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. holding that the dispute over non-execution of sale deed and refund of earnest money was essentially civil and did not disclose a cognizable criminal offence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. civil dispute vs criminal offence agreement to sell cheating

Prince Kapoor & Anr. v. Dhiraj Khosla

09 May 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2509

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that prior admission of tenancy estops denial of landlord's ownership and bona fide need for possession was established.

property petition_dismissed Significant eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B

Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt Ltd v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing (Tianjin) Co Ltd & Ors.

09 May 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2491

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark “ALLROUND” on toothpaste, holding that defendants cannot claim their similar marks to be descriptive after registering them.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Interim injunction Descriptive mark Passing off

Ramjas Foundation v. Arun Kumar Pruthi

09 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2501

The Delhi High Court held that incomplete land acquisition does not extinguish ownership rights, and a licensee cannot deny licensor's title, allowing recovery of license fee despite alleged acquisition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Land (Restriction on Transfer) Act, 1972 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 116 Evidence Act licensee estoppel

Shri Jai Gopal v. Shri Raj Kumar Sharma & Ors

09 May 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:2496

The High Court dismissed an election petition for failure to disclose material facts and particulars as required by law, emphasizing strict compliance to prevent frivolous election litigation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election petition Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 corrupt practices material facts

Satpal Singh v. Girja Shanker Shukla

09 May 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2508

The Delhi High Court upheld the attachment of a property not established as the judgment debtor's principal residence under Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC, dismissing the petition challenging execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC attachment of property principal residence execution of money decree

Mohd. Jafar v. The State; Mohd. Jamal v. The State

09 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2487

The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellants' conviction for possession of counterfeit currency under Sections 489B, 489C, and 34 IPC but reduced their sentence from seven to four years considering their clean antecedents and period of custody.

criminal appeal_allowed counterfeit currency Section 489B IPC Section 489C IPC Section 34 IPC

Deepak v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi

09 May 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:2488

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for robbery under Section 397 IPC and possession of arms, dismissing his appeal except for minor modification of default sentence for fine non-payment.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Section 397 IPC Arms Act FIR

Indian Olympic Association v. Union of India

09 May 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2489-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Union Government's competence to regulate national sports bodies through the National Sports Code, dismissing IOA's challenge to tenure restrictions as constitutionally valid and consistent with the Olympic Charter.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Legislative competence National Sports Code Indian Olympic Association Societies Registration Act