Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

State v. S.P. Tyagi & Ors.

16 May 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:2601

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a corruption case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case and that the presumption under Section 20 of the PC Act was not attracted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 20 PC Act hostile witnesses phenolphthalein test

Pankaj alias Praveen v. State

16 May 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:2600

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and abduction charges due to lack of evidence proving the essential elements of 'taking away' or 'enticement' under Sections 363 and 366 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant kidnapping abduction Section 363 IPC Section 366 IPC

Sunita Rana v. Hitesh Kumar Dheer & Ors.

16 May 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:2598

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by adding 50% towards future prospects and awarding damages for loss of amenities and expectation of life, following Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects permanent disability

SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD v. SEEMA & ORS

16 May 2014 · SURESH KAIT · 2014:DHC:2597

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award granting compensation with 50% addition for future prospects and affirmed the quantum of non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident claim involving a young deceased.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim future prospects minimum wages non-pecuniary damages

Kasim @ Pappu v. Kunwar Nath & Ors.

16 May 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:2614

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by applying 50% future prospects addition, rejecting contributory negligence based solely on lack of license, and awarding damages for disability and non-pecuniary losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant future prospects contributory negligence permanent disability loss of amenities of life

SHRI BAL KRISHAN GUPTA & ANR. v. SHRI VIKAS AGGARWAL & ANR

16 May 2014 · CHIEF JUSTICE; RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J. · 2014:DHC:2616-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that deposit of balance sale consideration in court is not a mandatory condition for suit maintainability or interim relief in specific performance cases unless the plaintiff's readiness and willingness are in doubt, allowing withdrawal of deposited funds in absence of exceptional circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance balance sale consideration Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act deposit in court

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Anr. v. Lt. Governor, Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.

16 May 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:2610

Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of a petrol pump's NOC based on Airports Authority of India's revocation of land allotment and legitimate land requirements, dismissing the writ petition.

administrative petition_dismissed No Objection Certificate Petroleum Rules 2002 Airports Authority of India License cancellation

Vishal Yadav v. State of Delhi & Anr.

16 May 2014 · Gita Mittal; J. R. Midha · 2014:DHC:2604-DB

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convicted prisoner to attend his brother’s marriage, imposing strict conditions to safeguard complainant and witnesses.

criminal petition_allowed parole convicted prisoner Section 302 IPC personal bond

Shishir Kumar @ Chunnu v. State

16 May 2014 · G.S. Sistani; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:2596-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping a child for ransom and conspiracy, affirming that minor contradictions do not vitiate a reliable prosecution case supported by competent child witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping ransom child witness voice identification

D.T.C. v. Bahadur Singh & Anr.

16 May 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:2589

The Delhi High Court held that while misconduct in strike participation justifies dismissal, the penalty must be proportionate and within prescribed regulations, remanding for appropriate penalty and limited reinstatement benefits.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1981 illegal strike misconduct

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-III v. Gopal Gupta

16 May 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:2603-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Settlement Commission's order interpreting disputed receipts as loans, holding that judicial review is limited to legality and not factual reappraisal, and dismissed the Revenue's petition alleging non-disclosure.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245C Income Tax Act full and true disclosure judicial review

Janak Datwani v. Jamna Datwani & Ors.

16 May 2014 · The Chief Justice; Pradeep Nandrajog · 2014:DHC:2593-DB

The Delhi High Court consolidated multiple family disputes over shareholding and property possession in CNA Exports Pvt. Ltd., modified interim possession and maintenance orders, and curtailed abusive litigation to ensure fair and efficient justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant consolidation of suits abuse of process interim order possession rights

Shri Ram Chand Rupana v. State Bank of Patiala

16 May 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:2621

The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a suit against a bank where the cause of action arose at the bank's subordinate office outside Delhi, and the plaint is returned for filing in the appropriate court.

civil other Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC cause of action limitation

Tekla Corporation & Anr v. Survo Ghosh & Anr

16 May 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. · 2014:DHC:2588

The Delhi High Court held that the defense of copyright misuse is not recognized under Indian law and rejected the defendants' plea, granting permanent injunction to the plaintiffs for copyright infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant copyright misuse copyright infringement Copyright Act, 1957 equitable defense

Tanu Goel & Anr v. Girish Chopra & Ors

16 May 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:2590

The Delhi High Court held that a purchaser's right to specific performance of an Agreement to Sell immovable property is not negated by a clause for refund of advance with interest, and readiness and willingness can be established by sanctioned home loan and conduct evidencing intent to complete the sale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance Agreement to Sell readiness and willingness mortgaged property

Hamdard Education Society & Anr. v. Abdul Rehman & Anr.

16 May 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2585-DB

The Delhi High Court held that employees of one recognized school cannot be transferred to another school established by the same society, affirming that each school's managing committee alone is the employer.

labor appeal_allowed Significant recognized school employer-employee relationship transfer of employee managing committee

Hamdard Education Society & Anr. v. Abdul Rehman & Anr.

16 May 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2584-DB

The Delhi High Court held that employees of one recognized school cannot be transferred to another recognized school established by the same society, as each school is an independent employer under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Managing Committee recognized school employer-employee relationship

Dr. Rakesh Bhagat & Anr. v. Neena Ahuja & Anr.

16 May 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:2624

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order based on the landlord's bona fide medical need for ground floor premises, dismissing the tenant's challenge for lack of triable issues.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e)

Sandeep & Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2612

The Delhi High Court held that succession to acquired agricultural land is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, overriding the Delhi Land Reforms Act, entitling mother, widow, and daughter to shares in compensation despite unproven Wills.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Will proof

M/S CBATE INTERNATIONAL v. Union of India

16 May 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:2613

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking arbitral Award for lack of reasons under Section 31(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(3) reasoned Award non-speaking Award