Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Rajendra Singh Rathore v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte decree for liquidated damages under Order XXXVII CPC, holding the stipulated sum was a penalty, summons service was valid, and granted conditional leave to defend.
Sheikh Shah Alam v. Kabul Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, rejecting the tenant's application for leave to defend due to lack of triable issues and bona fide requirement established by the landlord.
M/S VALUE SOURCE MERCANTILE LTD. v. M/S SPAN MECHNOTRONIX LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the power of courts under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to direct payment of rent arrears during arbitration, rejecting the appellant’s partial lease termination claim and dismissing the appeal.
Sat Narayan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee of a government kiosk has no perpetual right to occupy the premises and the license can be terminated lawfully without obligation to rehabilitate, even if the licensee is physically handicapped.
Abhinav Cooperative Group Housing Society Ltd. v. Uppal Engineering Company Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the binding nature of a mediation settlement and pierced the corporate veil to prevent judgment debtor's attempt to defeat execution by transferring property to a related company.
Idiscoveri Education Pvt Ltd v. Youreka Outbound Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court approved the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies and dispensed with convening stakeholder meetings based on unanimous written consents under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Manoj Pawar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that pay fixation under the 6th Central Pay Commission cannot be revised to an employee’s detriment without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing, and recovery of excess salary paid without fraud is impermissible.
Ankur Chhibber v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that government pay cannot be reduced or recovered without issuing a show cause notice and opportunity of hearing, quashing arbitrary pay revision and recovery orders against a CRPF Head Constable.
GC Ketan Bhateja v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging medical disqualification due to Thalassemia Trait, holding that it will not substitute its opinion for the expert Medical Board in military recruitment fitness matters.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation remains pending, regardless of interim court orders.
Suresh Kumar v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a CISF constable due to procedural irregularities and unreliable evidence in the departmental inquiry, ordering reinstatement with partial back wages.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation has not been effected, regardless of interim court orders.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation remain unpaid, regardless of interim court orders.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation remains unpaid, regardless of interim court orders.
Jagjit Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation remains pending, regardless of interim court orders.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made over five years ago but possession or compensation remains pending, regardless of interim court orders.
Jagjit Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the old Act lapse under section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if an award was made five or more years prior to the new Act but possession or compensation remains incomplete, regardless of interim court orders.
Pradeep Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant’s conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part-II IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, but reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors and compensation offered.
Centre for Human Rights v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions to improve a children's hospital, holding that judicial intervention requires sufficient factual basis and that health policy matters are primarily governmental prerogatives.
Apoorv Yadav v. University of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's aggregate attendance requirement for LL.B. students, ruling that both 70% subject-wise and 66% aggregate attendance are necessary to appear in exams and be promoted.