Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/S S. SHALU CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LTD v. BHARAT JEE KOHLI & ANR.
The court allowed the plaintiff to produce original documents as additional evidence in rebuttal under CPC provisions, clarifying the limited scope of recalling witnesses after cross-examination.
UOI v. Sh. Ramesh Chander Pal
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order granting second financial upgradation under the ACP scheme, holding that "in situ" promotions outside the regular hierarchy do not count as promotions for ACP purposes.
Vijay Kumar Ahluwalia & Ors. v. Bishan Chand Maheswari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenant on landlord's bonafide necessity under the Rent Control Act, confirming landlord's ownership and rejecting alternative accommodation claims.
Dinesh Kumar @ Deepak v. Shiv Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing substitution of plaintiffs under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC due to devolution of interest, dismissing the petition under Article 227 for lack of prejudice or gross injustice.
Joginder Chaudhary & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 380, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in a predominantly civil dispute.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Dinesh Dixit & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sh. Rajvir Rana & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that delay in applying for alternative land allotment beyond a non-statutory public notice's time limit should be condoned and directed reconsideration of the application.
Ashok Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that possession of land wrongly taken under the Land Acquisition Act must be restored to the petitioner after de-notification, upholding the constitutional protection against deprivation of property without due process.
Sunder Pal v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court held that limitation periods prescribed by non-statutory public notices cannot bar allotment of alternative plots in land acquisition cases and directed reconsideration of the petitioner's application.
Rastriya Prigya Sansthan v. Govt. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regularisation of Louis Braille Vihar Colony and protection from alleged harassment, holding that the colony failed to meet the built-up area requirement for regularisation and that police found no substantiated evidence of harassment.
Staff Selection Commission v. Parveen and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order invalidating post-advertisement imposition of minimum qualifying marks in the interview stage, directing selection based on aggregate marks as per advertised criteria.
Staff Selection Commission v. Parveen and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order invalidating the SSC's post-advertisement imposition of interview qualifying marks, directing selection based solely on aggregate marks as per the original recruitment scheme.
Sh. Bhim Sain Shastri Through His Legal Heirs v. Sh. Sharat Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on the ground of landlord's bonafide necessity to use the tenanted premises for business, dismissing the tenant's challenge to the eviction.
Gurnam Kaur v. Pritam Singh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court dismissed Defendant No.1's application under Section 151 CPC to file a written statement after default dismissal, held the disputed sale deeds forged, and directed urgent police investigation into the matter.
Yashaswi Aggarwal and Anr. v. Sh. Rakesh Aggarwal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that transferring possession in violation of a clear status quo order constitutes contempt of court and directed restoration of possession accordingly.
Smithkline & French Laboratories Ltd. and Anr. v. Mohd. Mateen and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to plaintiffs against defendants manufacturing and selling counterfeit IODEX products, holding such acts as trademark and copyright infringement and passing off.
State v. Hari Chand
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
State v. Anoop Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of Anoop Singh for murder due to lack of evidence proving conspiracy or involvement beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S. VISHAL BEVERAGES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking relaxation of time to claim drawback, holding that wrongful and delayed reversal of CENVAT credit disentitles the petitioner from relief under Rule 7A of the Re-export Rules.