Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Upender Singh & Ors. v. Rajesh Sachdeva & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to quash criminal proceedings under Sections 323/506 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC after prima facie assessment of the offence's nature and evidence.
Upender Singh & Ors. v. Rajesh Sachdeva & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 323/506 IPC and Arms Act based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in non-heinous offence cases.
Ajay Chugh & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Rajinder Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 380, 448, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Krishan Kumar Bansal thr. his Lrs. v. Shyam Lal Bansal
The court held that the right to sue in a suit concerning immovable property survives the death of a defendant, allowing legal heirs to be brought on record under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.
Nadira Begum v. Nafisa & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order allowing substitution of legal heirs with condonation of delay, holding that parties should not suffer for counsel's negligence and no injustice was caused.
Sanjay Sehgal v. State & Others
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act after finding no legal impediments and compliance with procedural requirements.
K.L. Narang v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as an abuse of process, holding that repeated challenges to the same eviction order after withdrawal and dismissal of earlier petitions are barred and do not entitle reinstatement under the special provisions Act.
Tushar Properties Private Limited v. Sheena Properties Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under the Companies Act, 1956, clarifying tax liabilities and confirming the transfer of assets and liabilities without prejudice to stakeholders.
Autometers Limited v. Greenvale Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the demerger scheme under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, validating the appointed date and compliance undertakings despite procedural concerns raised by the Regional Director.
Madhukar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping and ransom against three appellants based on credible victim testimony and recovery evidence, while acquitting a fourth accused due to lack of involvement.
Madhukar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping and ransom based on credible victim testimony despite absence of scientific voice analysis, while confirming acquittal of an accused not directly involved.
Madhukar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping and ransom based on credible child testimony and recovery evidence, while acquitting one accused due to insufficient proof of involvement.
Madhukar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping and ransom based on credible eyewitness and police evidence, while acquitting one accused due to lack of direct involvement.
B.H. Enterprises & Ors. v. Techmesh Products India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's dismissal of the petitioners' application to stay suit proceedings on arbitration grounds, holding that denial of the arbitration agreement and participation in the suit amounts to submission to civil court jurisdiction.
Rajinder Kumar and Ors. v. Padmavati Thr Legal Heir & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution order directing removal of a shutter obstructing the respondents' free access to the first floor, dismissing the petitioners' challenge and emphasizing strict enforcement of decree rights.
Amarjeet Singh v. Vimal Taneja and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a duly registered Will dated 28.2.1994, rejecting a subsequent unregistered Will and dismissing the appeal challenging the probate.
Sambhavana v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that statutory guidelines under the Disabilities Act mandate 1% reservation and 20 minutes compensatory time per hour for visually impaired candidates in Civil Services Examination, directing UPSC to comply accordingly.
Surender Kumar Mathur v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's murder conviction due to denial of fair trial caused by undue haste and refusal to recall witnesses, emphasizing that speedy trial must not compromise fairness under Article 21.
Union of India v. M/S MAK EXPORTS
The High Court held that while setting aside an ex parte decree under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC, the defendant must deposit a reasonable portion of the decretal amount, modifying the trial court's order to require 50% deposit as a just condition.