Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Rajinder Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order allowing a public servant to withdraw his voluntary retirement notice within reasonable time despite alleged misconduct, emphasizing fair consideration and procedural propriety.
Sanovi Technologies (India) Pvt Ltd v. Aditya Shyam Bhatia and Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to implead a closely connected company as a necessary party to a copyright infringement suit to ensure complete adjudication and avoid multiplicity of litigation.
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. GURMEET KAUR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, affirming liability for compensation due to negligent driving of the Toyota Qualis and upholding the quantum of compensation including future prospects.
Devender Singh v. Gian Prakash Saini
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction on bonafide necessity grounds, holding the landlord lacked suitable alternative accommodation and was entitled to evict the tenant.
DTC and Anr. v. Samida Begum and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld negligence of the bus driver in a fatal accident but modified the compensation award based on correct income and multiplier calculations as per Supreme Court precedents.
ASI/M Madan Lal & Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that petitioners denied promotion due to an impossible Pharmacy Act registration requirement are entitled to be treated equally with similarly placed persons and granted promotion benefits retrospectively.
A.K. Banerji & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal charges under Section 338 IPC against doctors, holding that final expert opinion by the Medical Council of India negated medical negligence and no prima facie case for criminal prosecution existed.
Vandana Batra v. Aerens Goldsouk International Ltd.
The Delhi High Court recalled a consent order referring a landlord-tenant dispute to arbitration based on an unregistered and inadequately stamped lease deed, restoring the suit for civil adjudication in line with the Supreme Court's SMS Tea Estate ruling.
Manav Dharma Trust v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that failure to deposit compensation in court as required under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, results in the acquisition being deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, even if the person interested refuses compensation.
MANAV DHARMA TRUST v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that failure to deposit compensation in Court as required under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 means compensation is not deemed paid, resulting in lapse of acquisition under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Commissioner of Income Tax-XII v. Indo Rub Industries
The High Court upheld the ITAT order dismissing the Revenue's revision under Section 263, holding that the Assessing Officer had conducted necessary inquiries and missing documents alone do not justify setting aside an assessment order.
Suresh v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a two-year externment order against a habitual bootlegger, ruling that the authority's satisfaction based on sufficient material and procedural fairness was not vitiated.
Rajinder Kumar Arora v. Rajni Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld a bonafide necessity eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act, ruling that alternative residential premises cannot satisfy a commercial business need and that additional grounds filed beyond the statutory period for leave to defend are inadmissible.
M/S STRACON INDIA LTD v. PRASAR BHARTI
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing payment of Rs. 7.31 crores, holding that the claim was not barred by limitation and the award was not against public policy or jurisdictional limits.
ARAVALI POWER COMPANY PVT LTD v. M/S SUBHASH INFRA ENGINEERS LTD
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitrator's order releasing the final bill payment was an interim award not appealable, but the order releasing the bank guarantee was an interim order appealable and set aside for non-compliance with contractual conditions.
Pandit Munshi & Associates Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) is not an arbitral award and cannot be challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ramesh Gupta v. Rakesh Gupta
The Delhi High Court granted possession to the plaintiff based on admitted terms of a registered Will, rejecting the defendant's vague denial and family settlement claim, allowing decree under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.
Salazar Luis Anthony Marques v. Mohd. Haroon Japanwala & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction where the tenant's leave to defend application was rejected due to a fatal defect of non-attested affidavit, holding that actual knowledge of summons suffices as effective service and limitation was correctly computed considering court holidays.
Rajpal v. Prakash Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging the condonation of a 25-day delay in bringing legal heirs on record, holding such orders non-appealable and the petition frivolous.
M/S RATHI STEELS LTD. v. M/S SENBO ENGINEERING LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld that a contractual territorial jurisdiction clause confers exclusive jurisdiction to the specified courts even without explicit exclusivity wording, dismissing the petition challenging the trial court's order.