Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Chinar Buildwell Private Limited v. Samarth Town Planners Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings due to unanimous shareholder consent and absence of creditors.
Heritage Towers Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Pashupati Towers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to their written consents and absence of objections.
Rajgharana Projects Private Limited v. Umra Securities Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, sanctioning a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies while dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on obtained consents.
Dugar Capital Services Private Limited v. Dipankur Ceroils Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors based on their written consents and noting the absence of secured creditors.
Kulbushan Singh Nim v. M/S. ICICI Bank Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against execution of a decree passed under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that arbitration rights cannot be claimed without a Section 8 application and that auction valuation in execution is binding.
Ajit Kar v. Ram Pratap & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging the trial court's imposition of nominal costs for adjournment, holding that such interference is unwarranted absent grave injustice.
Prathiba M. Singh v. Singh and Associates
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief directing the defendant law firm to use its registered logo with clarifying inscriptions to prevent confusion with the plaintiff's registered mark "Singh & Singh", balancing trademark rights and fair use of common surnames.
Subhash Kathuria v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, without possession or compensation for over five years as of 2014, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Shanti Prakash Gupta & Ors v. Ebony Retail Holdings Ltd.
The Delhi High Court admitted the winding up petition for arrears of rent against the respondent company, holding disputed claims for interest and service tax require trial in a civil suit.
Ram Singh v. State (GNCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence of a father for raping his minor daughters, emphasizing the credibility of victim testimony and corroborative medical evidence despite delay in reporting.
Chaman Lal v. CBI
The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's sentence during appeal pendency, granting relief on parity with co-accused subject to bond and conditions.
Rashmi Jain v. Additional Director General of Foreign Trade
The Delhi High Court held that a high seas seller who is not the importer cannot be penalized under the Foreign Trade Act for import violations absent knowledge or intent, setting aside the penalty imposed on M/s Balaji Impex.
DR. C.M. PRASAD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
An Indian citizen with foreign medical qualifications must qualify the statutory screening test under the Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 2001 and Screening Test Regulations, 2002 to be registered as a medical practitioner in India.
Jongi @ Ravi v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the conviction of a sexual assault accused under the POCSO Act to sexual harassment, reducing the sentence based on evidentiary inconsistencies and the nature of the offence.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sanjay Singharia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is liable to pay compensation for accidents caused by a minor driver without a license but can recover the amount from the vehicle owner who negligently permitted unauthorized use.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Malti Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurer's appeal by adjusting compensation components in a motor accident claim, affirming inclusion of Transport Allowance as income, mandating income tax deduction, upholding 15% future prospects enhancement, and reducing loss of estate compensation.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Munesh Devi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the truck driver liable for rash and negligent driving causing the fatal accident, rejecting the insurer's appeal based on the deceased's alleged intoxication and police closure report.
MASHBRA INDUSTRIES PVT LTD v. UOI
The Delhi High Court held that a decree holder cannot claim interest at 18% per annum from the date of arbitral award in execution proceedings once the Court has finally rejected such claim and awarded interest at 9% per annum from the date of the decree.
Ashu & Ors. v. New India Assurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's findings of sole negligence by the truck driver, affirmed the grant of future prospects in loss of dependency, enhanced compensation amounts, and dismissed the insurance company's appeals.
Parveen Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking railway compensation, holding that the deceased died by suicide and was not a bonafide passenger, thus excluding liability under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.