Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

Sonu v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Oct 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:5407

The Delhi High Court acquitted four appellants of gang rape charges due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and absence of corroborative medical and forensic evidence, emphasizing the necessity of credible and consistent evidence for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony corroboration medical evidence

M/S CYGNUS MEDICATE PVT. LTD. v. BANK OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS

16 Oct 2014 · G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:5401

The Delhi High Court refused interim injunction to enforce a disputed hospital management agreement amid allegations of fraud and prior termination, directing completion of pleadings before relief.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction Medical Services Agreement fraud sham agreement

Veena Seth v. Rajshree Trivedi

16 Oct 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:5402

The Delhi High Court decreed the Plaintiff's suit for possession and mesne profits, holding that the Defendant unlawfully occupied the terrace portion beyond her rights under the Sale Deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant possession suit mesne profits gift deed sale deed

United India Insurance Company Ltd v. Jagwati @ Savitri and Ors.

16 Oct 2014 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5421

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's finding that the DTC bus driver's rash and negligent driving caused the accident, dismissing the insurer's appeals challenging liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim rash and negligent driving eyewitness testimony preponderance of probabilities

Acheraj Lal Lamba v. Tilak Raj Lamba and Anr.

16 Oct 2014 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2014:DHC:5424

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's suit for declaration, partition, and possession of property based on a valid Will and agreements, appointing a commissioner to effect partition.

civil appeal_allowed partition suit declaration of ownership Will agreement to sell

Satish Gupta v. Mohan Goyal

16 Oct 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:5418

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction on bonafide necessity grounds, ruling that no alternative suitable vacant accommodation existed and that eviction is maintainable even if premises are dilapidated and intended for reconstruction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bonafide necessity eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternative accommodation

JSL Media Ltd v. Metro Communications

16 Oct 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:5423

The Delhi High Court granted unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit where the defendant raised a bona fide triable issue based on a settlement agreement transferring properties in lieu of outstanding dues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit settlement agreement

M/S STRATEGIC OVERSEAS PVT LTD v. M/S AJS BUILDERS PVT LTD

16 Oct 2014 · G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:5419

The Delhi High Court decreed a recovery suit in favor of the plaintiff with interest after proceeding ex-parte against the defendant who failed to appear and refund amounts paid for unallotted plots.

civil appeal_allowed ex-parte proceedings recovery suit refund of amount non-allotment of plots

Pawan Mathur v. Janak MB Singh & Ors.

16 Oct 2014 · A.K. Pathak · 2014:DHC:5417

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's delayed appeal for want of sufficient cause, emphasizing that vague or negligent reasons do not justify condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause government litigation

EDCIL (INDIA) LTD v. VISESH INFOTECNICS LTD

16 Oct 2014 · A.K. Pathak · 2014:DHC:5416

The Delhi High Court held that a contractual penalty clause is enforceable only as liquidated damages upon proof of actual loss, and in absence thereof, only reasonable damages are recoverable for delay in supply and installation of computers.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant liquidated damages penalty Section 74 Indian Contract Act contract delay

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

16 Oct 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:5422-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that adjustment of income tax refund against outstanding demand without prior intimation and opportunity of hearing under Section 245 is illegal and quashed the adjustment order.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 245 Income Tax Act Adjustment of refund Opportunity of hearing Prior intimation

Subhash Chandra Gupta v. Shell India & Ors.

16 Oct 2014 · V. P. Vaish · 2014:DHC:5410

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the question of the petitioner's liability as a director is a matter for trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Dishonour of cheque Director liability

Sadakat v. State & Anr.

16 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5409

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement and divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Devender v. State & Ors.

16 Oct 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:5408

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 365/34 IPC on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties at the preliminary investigation stage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR non-compoundable offence settlement between parties

M/S ABASKAR CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. v. DEVI DUTT & ORS.

16 Oct 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU, J · 2014:DHC:5403

The Delhi High Court held that retrenchment orders issued by a Joint Managing Director with ostensible authority and ratified by the Board are valid, and found no violation of Industrial Disputes Act provisions, setting aside the Labour Court's award invalidating retrenchment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Joint Managing Director Articles of Association Retrenchment Industrial Disputes Act 1947

Raj Kumar Gursahani v. Securities & Exchange Board of India

16 Oct 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:5405

The Delhi High Court upheld SEBI's circular extending the arbitration limitation period from six months to three years, rejecting the petitioner's challenge to its retrospective application.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SEBI circular limitation period arbitration retrospective effect

Surender Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Oct 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:5399

The Delhi High Court acquitted a DDA Patwari accused of bribery due to unreliable prosecution evidence and procedural lapses, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt and proper forensic chain of custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act Section 20 PC Act presumption

Ruby v. State

16 Oct 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5414-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a genuine municipal birth certificate proving juvenility can be considered at any stage, leading to modification of sentence despite upholding conviction for murder under IPC.

criminal sentence_modified Significant juvenility age determination juvenile justice birth certificate

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV v. M/S Himalya International Ltd.

16 Oct 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:5420-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against deletion of certain export-related expenses and held that TDS provisions did not apply as the foreign consignee agent was not taxable in India.

tax appeal_dismissed Income Tax Assessment Addition deletion USA office expenses Consignee agent

M/S ABASKAR CONSTRUCTION (P) LTD. v. DEVI DUTT & ORS.

16 Oct 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU, J · 2014:DHC:5404

The Delhi High Court held that retrenchment orders issued by a Joint Managing Director, ratified by the Board, are valid and lawful, and the Labour Court's findings on compliance with retrenchment procedures under the Industrial Disputes Act were upheld.

labor appeal_allowed Significant retrenchment Joint Managing Director Articles of Association Industrial Disputes Act, 1947