Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Union of India v. Suraj Bhan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's delayed appeal against a land acquisition compensation award due to unexplained delay and upheld the compensation granted to the respondents.
Union of India v. Krishna Rani Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal as time barred due to unexplained delay and upheld the compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Union of India v. Ram Saroop & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal as time barred due to unexplained delay and upheld the compensation awarded for land acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Banyan Tree Holding (P) Limited v. Jamshyad Sethna and Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment of plaint to include trademark infringement claims based on registrations obtained during the suit, emphasizing a liberal approach under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to determine real controversies and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
M/S FAR EAST MARKETING (P) LTD v. M/S KHURANA ELECTRICALS & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that dishonoured cheques and a written acknowledgment of debt create a presumption of liability, dismissing the defendants' leave to defend and arbitration plea, and decreed recovery with interest in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC.
Jagdish Kumar v. Tribal Cooperative Marketing Development Federation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination of a contractual employee for unauthorized absence, holding that the contractual terms were binding and the petitioner failed to disclose material facts.
Union of India & Ors. v. Prem Pal Singh; Union of India & Ors. v. Shyam Pyare Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that temporary railway service followed by substantive appointment is fully reckonable for pension, and half the period of casual labour service after attaining temporary status counts for pension benefits under the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993.
Union of India & Ors. v. Prem Pal Singh; Union of India & Ors. v. Shyam Pyare Yadav & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld CAT orders allowing railway employees to reckon entire temporary service and half casual labour service for pension under Rule 20 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993.
Rattan Lal Raina v. India Meteorological Department and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that displaced government employees are not entitled to indefinite occupation of government accommodation post-retirement, balancing fundamental rights with the State’s property rights and rehabilitation principles.
Amit v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions based on reliable injured witness testimony despite investigative lapses and delay in FIR, but acquitted one appellant due to unreliable identification.
Abhay Singh Yadav v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that anticipatory bail granted for a lesser offence does not continue when a more serious offence like murder under Section 302 IPC is added, allowing police to arrest the accused without prior bail cancellation.
Sukhinder Kaur & Anr. v. Vaneet Kaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order impleading a party claiming ownership via succession certificate in a matrimonial property dispute, affirming the widow’s absolute vesting in her deceased husband’s share.
Ashok Kumar v. Praveen Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, ruling that the five-year bar under Section 14(6) of the Delhi Rent Control Act runs from initial co-ownership acquisition and that tenants cannot challenge landlord's ownership in eviction proceedings.
Shree Nirman Limited v. Regional Director (Northern Region), Ministry of Corporate Affairs
The Delhi High Court allowed Shree Nirman Limited's petition to reduce its share capital under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with certain procedural requirements given no creditor interests were affected.
Magic Tradelink Private Limited v. Vikas Polymerland Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a scheme of amalgamation application, dispensing with certain creditor and shareholder meetings based on consents and directing court-supervised meeting of secured creditors.
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT & ANR. v. SIEMENS SOLUTIONS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against the defendant for infringing the well-known SIEMENS trademark and using a confusingly similar domain name, reinforcing protection of intellectual property rights.
Laxman Singh v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court quashed the mechanical rejection of an alternative plot application and directed reconsideration after proper verification of relinquishment deeds among legal heirs.
Avinash EM Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. GAIL (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the arbitrator's refusal to grant injunction against encashment of bank guarantees, holding that prima facie fraud and lack of special equities justified encashment.
M/S RCK DEVELOPERS (P) LTD v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation is not paid by tendering to the landowner.
Yogesh Kumar Gupta & Anr v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, and mere deposit of compensation in court without offering it to the landowner does not constitute payment.