Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Manoj Garg v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the detention order under COFEPOSA for non-supply of relied upon documents, affirming the detenue’s right to effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
Sarbati Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Tehsildar to comply with the SDM's order and record the petitioner's name in the revenue records by deciding her mutation application within two weeks.
M/S. REDSON TEA LTD. v. EPF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that no coercive action can be taken to enforce EPF demands under Sections 14B and 7Q in the absence of an appellate tribunal, granting interim protection to the petitioner.
Shyam Lal & Ors. v. The Financial Commissioner & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an ex parte order obtained by appellants through fraudulent contradictory claims of possession and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication under Section 85 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act.
Ripu Daman Malik v. The Secretary, Land & Building Deptt.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to inform the petitioner about the status of her long-pending application for an alternative plot under a government scheme.
M/S INDIAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court disposed of a labor dispute petition as settled after the petitioner paid the agreed compensation, litigation costs, and interest to the workman.
Manu Khosla v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an unexecuted preventive detention order, reaffirming that pre-execution judicial review is limited to exceptional grounds as per established Supreme Court precedents.
Sahab Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, where no possession or compensation occurred within five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Narender Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act commenced are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Amarjeet Singh v. Land Acquisition Collector (South)
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years after the award, granting relief to landowners.
SHADEED IRON AND STEEL LLC v. ORES AND MINERAL CORPORATION
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a partial arbitral award, holding that unresolved issues prevented settlement and justified continuation of arbitration proceedings.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Kusum Lata & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the bus driver liable for rash and negligent driving and affirmed the compensation including future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.
Jawahar Lal Chhabra v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, entitling subsequent purchasers to relief.
Gagan Rastogi v. RP Explorer Master Fund & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted an injunction restraining foreign English court proceedings against the plaintiff, holding Indian courts as the appropriate forum due to closest nexus and to prevent abuse of process.
Union of India v. Rati Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal and upheld the compensation awarded for land acquired under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, relying on established precedent.
M/S. NIM INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE (P) LTD v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years before the 2013 Act's commencement.
Rekha Chandhok v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings pending under the 1894 Act without possession or compensation for over five years are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, granting the petitioner relief accordingly.
Nassebuddin v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession disputes.
Jagbir Singh v. Land Acquisition Collector (South East) & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.
Renu Shamlal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation have not been effected within five years prior to the 2013 Act's commencement.