Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Pankaj Kapur v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken or compensation not paid within five years, regardless of stay orders.
Shalini Gupta v. Lt Governor, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation are not completed within five years of the award.
Commissioner of Service Tax v. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd
The High Court referred to a Larger Bench the question whether the Tribunal can examine the merits of authorization by the Committee of Chief Commissioners under Section 86(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, holding that the Tribunal's review is limited to verifying existence of authorization.
Umesh Chandra Gaur v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the extension of a Director's tenure, holding that a mere aspirant lacks locus standi and directed the government to expedite the appointment process following the nomination of the Vice Chairman.
WELCOME INTERNATIONAL v. VENEZIA LETHERS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit for recovery of Rs.31,31,225.04 with interest against a defendant company that failed to appear or pay for goods supplied on credit.
Satbir Singh v. Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the premature closure of the petitioner’s application for alternative plot allotment and directed reconsideration after the full prescribed time for document submission had elapsed.
M/S PODDAR POLYMERS v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award granting compensation to a workman who failed to prove illegal termination of service.
M/S TATA SONS LTD v. WORKMEN & ANR
The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful compromise between Tata Sons Ltd. and the legal representative of a deceased employee, disposing of the writ petition as to that party and directing release of deposited funds accordingly.
Jai Prakash Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a defamation complaint against a police officer, holding that no prior sanction was required and no prima facie case was made out.
M/S PODDAR POLYMERS v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award granting compensation for alleged illegal termination where the workman failed to prove termination and had accepted prior settlement payments.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV v. M/S OKS Span Tech Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a single auditor's report bifurcating income for multiple export-oriented units satisfies Section 10B(5) requirements, dismissing the Revenue's delayed appeal challenging the deduction claim.
Edini Steels Private Limited v. Satish Autogas Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Edini Steels Private Limited and Satish Autogas Private Limited under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing transfer of assets and liabilities and dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Adinath Food Private Limited v. ICMC Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Adinath Food Pvt Ltd and ICMC Corporation Ltd under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the Transferor Company without winding up after addressing regulatory concerns.
Malav Holdings Private Limited & Ors. v. Official Liquidator & Ors.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing the appointed date to be shifted and requiring RBI compliance undertakings for NBFCs.