Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
AMAN INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION v. NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that applications for recognition of educational courses must be processed strictly as per statutory procedure with an opportunity to remove deficiencies, and directed fresh applications under new regulations.
CT. K. N. Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the transfer of injured BSF personnel with static duties to a non-naxalite area, holding the transfer lawful and justified.
Mr.Ajesh Luthra, Advocate. v. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION &ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain recruitment-related Original Applications involving Delhi Police even when other organizations fall outside its jurisdiction, and remanded the cases for merits adjudication.
Supreme Court in Maharashtra Ekta Hawkers Union and v. Anr., 2013(11) SCALE 329
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding street vendors' rights under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 must be adjudicated by the Town Vending Committee, directing its constitution and functioning and dismissing petitions for injunctions against eviction.
EX-CT/GD SURESH KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Force Court convictions of SSB personnel for being misconceived and clarified that CCS (CCA) Rules do not apply to them, emphasizing adherence to SSB Rules, 2009.
Dr Ashutosh,Advocate v. R S MEENA
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to transfer a complaint alleging illegal detention and torture from Saket Court to Patiala House Courts, permitting withdrawal and refiling under Section 407 CrPC.
Nimbus Communications Ltd v. Prasar Bharti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request and also dismissed the pending stay application.
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that sale of hybrid seeds destroys the novelty of parent lines, precluding their registration as new plant varieties under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that sale of hybrid seeds amounts to disposal of propagating or harvested material of parent lines, destroying their novelty and barring their registration as new plant varieties under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that sale of hybrid seeds destroys the novelty of parent lines, rendering them ineligible for registration as new plant varieties under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that commercial sale of hybrid seeds destroys the novelty of parent lines, rendering them ineligible for registration as new plant varieties under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
Novartis AG & Anr v. Cipla Ltd
Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to Novartis against Cipla for infringement of patent on INDACATEROL, affirming patent validity and working in India while balancing public interest and constitutional right to health.
Phonographic Performance Ltd. v. UOI
The Delhi High Court delivered a judgment on January 9, 2015, in a writ petition filed by Phonographic Performance Ltd. concerning intellectual property rights related to phonographic performances.
Phonographic Performance Ltd. & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Registrar of Copyrights' authority to grant compulsory licences for all radio stations under the Copyright Board's order and dismissed writ petitions challenging additional licences issued beyond the original complaint.
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S PCL SUNCON (JV)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that where a contract is silent on material sourcing, the party insisting on a specific source causing extra costs must bear those costs.
Mahavir Prasad v. Ved Bharat Kapoor
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an eviction petition, holding that the landlord failed to prove a bona fide requirement for the tenant's room under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Eastern Economist Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the second proviso to Section 3(a) of the PP Act, ruling that only officers of the statutory authority can be appointed as Estate Officers and rejecting the petitioner's challenge alleging bias and seeking transfer of eviction proceedings.
DR. HANS RAJ GUPTA v. INDER RAJ SINGH
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction petition filed by a legal heir on bona fide commercial grounds, dismissing the tenant’s challenge to the dismissal of leave to defend.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajesh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award for amputation, affirming the loss of earning capacity and overall compensation with minor adjustments.
Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Usha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that if an insurance company's legal offer under the agreed procedure is not accepted by claimants, the Claims Tribunal must conduct a full inquiry under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act before awarding compensation.