Delhi High Court
93,453 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court delivered a reserved judgment on connected income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against Yum Restaurants entities.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeals against Yum Restaurants, holding that the tax assessments were unsustainable and affirming the applicability of prior findings in connected appeals.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals, upholding the respondents' challenge to the tax assessments as unsustainable under the Income Tax Act.
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Man Chand and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order on promotion quotas, holding that once candidates enter a common cadre, quota rules under Article 16(1) apply without post-based reservation rosters, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.
Rampat v. Ganga Devi
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant seeking leave to defend an eviction petition must prima facie disclose triable issues through affidavits and material, and granted leave to defend where the tenant raised credible disputes regarding bona fide requirement and alternate accommodation.
Asha Khanna & Ors. v. Pankaj Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a probate petition is barred by res judicata where the validity of the Will has been conclusively decided in prior civil litigation between the same parties and property.
Uma Devi Deceased Thr. LRs. v. Shivraj Krishan Gupta & Ors.
The Court held that in a partition suit, the lis continues until full execution of the final decree, and directed appointment of a Commissioner to determine mesne profits and interest pendente lite as previously ordered.
Neeraj Shukla v. Frankfinn Aviation Services (P) Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's order granting leave to defend in a summary suit under Order 37 CPC due to triable issues raised by the defendant.
YAHOO INC v. ABDUL RASHEED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Yahoo Inc. restraining a Kerala salon from using the 'YAHOO' mark, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered trademark and caused passing off.
Subhash Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death, rejecting the petitioner's false alibi plea, but modified the sentence to time served with enhanced fines.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the assessee's service income is business income and allowed deductions for royalty payments, administrative expenses, depreciation, food tasting expenses, and provisions, dismissing the revenue's appeals.
Shree Shyam Enterprises v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court restrained coercive recovery proceedings under the EPF Act pending hearing of a statutory appeal that could not be heard due to the absence of a Presiding Officer of the Appellate Tribunal.
EICHER MOTORS LIMITED v. SANJIV KUMAR KHATOI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Eicher Motors for trademark and copyright infringement by defendants using a confusingly similar domain name and website.
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Guru Arjan Dev Rice Mills & Ors.
The Delhi High Court admitted a petition challenging an arbitral award for dealing with matters beyond arbitration scope and failure to state reasons, issuing notice to respondents while allowing recovery of awarded amount.
Abdulla v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of a proclaimed offender, reaffirming that such persons are not entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC.
M.C. Goyal v. Sardar Mehar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bonafide requirement to provide premises for his dependent son's business, affirming limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Ramesh Kumar v. Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging termination orders after a 12-year delay, holding that the doctrine of delay and laches bars relief despite no strict limitation period under Article 226.
Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. National Council for Teacher Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of deputation beyond the granted period, holding that acceptance of a limited extension estops the petitioner from claiming further tenure and that allegations of malice require factual proof.
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Ashok Rice Mills & Ors.
The Delhi High Court admitted a petition to set aside an arbitral award that was prima facie incomprehensible, lacked reasons, and was beyond the pleadings, ordering notice to respondents and further proceedings.
The Union of India & Ors v. M/S Rishi Engineering & Construction (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court admitted a petition to set aside an arbitral award for failure to state reasons and prima facie evidence of bias, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned awards under the Arbitration Act.