Delhi High Court

82,305 judgments

Year:

K.L. Enterprises LLP & Ors. v. Bajaj Finance Limited

21 Aug 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020:DHC:2227

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining the sale of pledged shares by the lender during the Covid-19 pandemic, balancing contractual rights with regulatory moratoriums and pandemic-induced hardships pending arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Loan-cum-Pledge Agreement Covid-19 pandemic

NAV CHETNA KALYAN SAMITI v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

11 Aug 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9738-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that no road exists at the disputed site in the approved layout plan and that in-principle regularization of an unauthorized colony does not imply approval of the disputed road.

property appeal_dismissed Significant approved layout plan unauthorized colony road dispute easement by necessity

Neelam Srivastava v. Union of India

10 Aug 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:6408-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, without possession or compensation for over five years before the 2013 Act, are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, granting the petitioners a declaration of lapse.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 acquisition proceedings lapse physical possession

National Highways Authority of India v. Yedeshi Aurangabad Tollway Limited

05 Aug 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2025:DHC:424
Cites 0 · Cited by 13

The Delhi High Court held that stay of an arbitral money award requires 100% deposit or security as per amended Section 36(3) and CPC principles, dismissing NHAI's stay application against a ₹1503 crore award in favor of Yedeshi.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 36(3) Arbitration and Conciliation Act Stay of Execution Money Decree

Someshwar Dayal v. Anupama Dayal

28 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:5811-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a spouse cannot withdraw a guardianship petition and continue to benefit from interim custody orders, allowing the other spouse to be transposed as petitioner to protect the children's welfare.

family appeal_allowed Significant Guardians and Wards Act Section 25 interim custody orders withdrawal of petition

Delhi Diocesan Trust Association v. Edwin William & Anr

22 Jul 2014 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7111

The High Court upheld the Trial Court's orders dismissing the petitioner's claim of fraudulent suit withdrawal, holding that the power of attorney was not legally revoked and no prima facie fraud was established.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant power of attorney revocation withdrawal of suit Section 115 CPC

The Indian Hotels Company Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council

14 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:7226-DB

The Delhi High Court held that IHCL had no vested right to renew the hotel licence, affirming NDMC's statutory right to conduct a public auction under Section 141(2) of the NDMC Act, 1994, and dismissed IHCL's suit.

property appeal_dismissed Significant New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 licence renewal joint venture licensee

Kartik Majhi v. Union of India

09 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Ran · 2015:DHC:11833-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court held that CRPF personnel posted in Left Wing Extremist Areas are entitled to retain family accommodation at Jyoti Kunj Complex, Dwarka, until alternative accommodation is allotted, quashing eviction and penal rent notices as arbitrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CRPF Family Accommodation Rules family accommodation retention Left Wing Extremist Areas penal rent

Ahmed Sikander v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Jul 2014 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:1728

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking parole for a life convict who had previously violated parole conditions and was involved in further crimes, holding that parole rejection was justified and lawful.

criminal petition_dismissed parole life imprisonment violation of parole Delhi Prisons Rules 2018

SMS Limited v. Oil & Natural Gas Limited

02 Jul 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:116

The Delhi High Court held that unconditional bank guarantees are invocable on demand and refused to grant pre-arbitral injunction restraining ONGC from invoking bank guarantees furnished by SMS for liquidated damages.

civil petition_dismissed Significant bank guarantee unconditional bank guarantee liquidated damages pre-arbitral injunction

M/S Mukti Credits Pvt. Ltd. v. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd.

30 Jun 2014 · Jyoti Singh · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 113

The Delhi High Court restrained the respondent from encashing the bank guarantee pending final adjudication of arbitral award objections, directing its return to the petitioner as the net amount payable was in the petitioner’s favor.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition bank guarantee security deposit

Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited v. UEM India Private Limited

19 Jun 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2023:DHC:1644

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the existence of an arbitration agreement prima facie requires arbitration, leaving jurisdictional disputes for the arbitrator to decide.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition arbitration agreement Memorandum of Understanding

Neha Gupta v. State of Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

09 Jun 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog · 2016:DHC:9230

Delhi High Court dismissed bail cancellation petition and modified charge from Section 308 IPC to Section 323 IPC based on medical evidence of superficial injury.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail cancellation Section 308 IPC superficial injury medical evidence

Ritika Prasad v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

06 Jun 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1927
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the university to issue educational degrees reflecting both parents' names, affirming gender equality and compliance with the UGC circular mandating inclusion of mothers' names on academic certificates.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant gender equality educational certificates parents' names University Grants Commission circular

Gobind Ram Arora & Ors v. Union of India and Ors

25 May 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:4696-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if no possession or compensation occurs within five years before the 2013 Act, even for subsequent purchasers.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 24(2) RTFCTLARR Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 lapse of acquisition proceedings subsequent purchasers

Rajiv Chhikara v. Sandhya Mathur

24 May 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2016:DHC:7894-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld divorce on grounds of mental cruelty, holding that unilateral withdrawal of mutual consent after settlement and an apology letter admitting cruelty justified dissolution of marriage.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act Section 13(1)(ia)

State Bank of India v. National Commission for Scheduled Castes

13 May 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2016:DHC:6588
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes lacked jurisdiction to recommend reconsideration of a finalized compulsory retirement penalty, allowing the Bank's writ petition challenging the Commission's order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Commission for Scheduled Castes Article 338 Constitution of India compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings

State of NCT of Delhi v. Ravi Sejwal & Anr

11 May 2014 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:9362-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt through circumstantial evidence and procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory call detail records recovery of weapon

Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Shonkh Technologies International Ltd.

25 Apr 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9092
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the Consortium Agreement for smart card vehicle registrations was valid till 2017, termination without a proper cure notice was invalid, and awarded damages to the respondents for unlawful termination.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Consortium Agreement Efflux of time Material breach

School Management of G D Salwan School v. Directorate of Education and Anr.

22 Apr 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2017:DHC:4057
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Directorate of Education's order granting a Physical Education Teacher the higher pay scale and arrears, rejecting the school's belated challenge on qualification grounds.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Physical Education Teacher pay scale Recruitment Rules NCTE norms