Delhi High Court
81,916 judgments
Vijay Kumar Gupta v. Bijender Kumar Panwar
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, holding that the presumption of valid consideration under Sections 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not rebutted and evidence from other cases cannot be relied upon.
Vipul Rohilla v. Meenakshi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of a perjury prosecution application under Section 340 Cr.P.C., holding that such prosecution should not be ordered to satisfy personal vendetta and must be exercised in the larger interest of justice.
Sharp Capital Private Limited v. Sharp Credits Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and no secured creditors existed.
ZF Components Investment Private Limited v. ZF India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between ZF Components Investment Private Limited and ZF India Private Limited, dispensing with shareholder and creditor meetings due to unanimous consent and absence of creditors.
Baweja Realtech Private Limited v. Singhman Finex Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all stakeholders gave written consent.
Phool Singh & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, holding that reliable eyewitness testimony outweighs investigative lapses and that interested witnesses' evidence is admissible if credible.
All India Film Corporation Private Limited; The All India Investment Corporation Private Limited; World Media International Limited v. World Media Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors where all consents were obtained and no secured creditors existed.
Vineet Jain v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to pay EPF dues in 15 monthly instalments as per the respondents' circular, directing recovery on default.
Parveen Kumar Beniwal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld revocation of an arms licence for suppression of previous criminal case involvement in the renewal application, affirming the licensing authority's wide discretion and limited judicial review.
ATV Projects India Limited v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the AAIFR order permitting secured creditors to initiate legal proceedings against a sick company, directing BIFR to monitor the One Time Settlement and Debt Restructuring Scheme for expeditious revival.
Shatrughan Thakur v. The Director of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that contractual appointments of school employees without genuine administrative exigency are invalid, regularizing their services with statutory protection under the Delhi School Education Act and Rules, 1973.
Syed Moiz Quadri v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed review petition challenging a teacher’s qualification and age eligibility, holding that the petitioner met recruitment rules and was unjustly terminated.
Kamlesh v. Dilbagh Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff to protect her peaceful possession of land purchased through a registered Sale Deed, against ex parte defendants' threats and interference.
Ashok Goel v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that GGSIPU can validly grant affiliation to colleges located within the National Capital Region, including outside Delhi, if the concerned State grants a No Objection Certificate.
R. Murgadas & Ors. v. Satya Pal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for death in a motor accident by applying the principle that non-dependent legal representatives are entitled to loss to estate calculated as one-third of the deceased’s income, along with love and affection and funeral expenses.
United India Insurance Company Ltd v. Pradeep Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an insurance company proving willful breach of policy terms by the insured, including use of a fake or expired driving licence, is entitled to recover compensation paid from the insured.
Maya Devi & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between parties in a commercial dispute, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sanjeev Sood & Ors. v. Ravi Kanta Madhok
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) DRC Act, affirming bona fide commercial requirement by the landlord's family and rejecting res judicata and alternative accommodation defenses.
Abhishek Kumar Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court remanded UGC NET answer key grievances for reconsideration due to unreasoned expert rejection, emphasizing limited judicial interference only when answer keys are palpably erroneous.
Abhishek Kumar Pandey v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded the petitioners' challenge to certain NET exam answer keys to the UGC for reconsideration, holding that expert decisions must be reasoned and fair and courts will intervene if answer keys are demonstrably erroneous.