Delhi High Court

82,305 judgments

Year:

Deepak Mitra v. Govt. of NCT

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3989

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a director under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that a company under liquidation cannot commit the offence and directors are not liable post-liquidation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act company liquidation director liability dishonour of cheque

DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE & DEVELOPOMENT CORPORATION v. M/S ROSHAN REAL ESTATES PVT. LTD.

01 May 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:3976-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting 2% of contract value as loss of profit, ruling that limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act does not extend to disputing reasonable quantification of damages.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 loss of profit quantum of damages

Govind Gopal Garg & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3975

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Raju Jain v. State of New Delhi & Anr.

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3974

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal case under Sections 420 and 409 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise in criminal cases Sections 420 and 409 IPC

ANKUSH KAUSHIK & ORS v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3973

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, applying the principles laid down by the Supreme Court for quashing criminal proceedings in such cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Ram Naresh v. State

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3977

The Delhi High Court directed the police to consider the dying declaration and post-mortem report before proceeding with investigation into the unnatural death of the petitioner’s daughter.

criminal other FIR registration unnatural death dying declaration post-mortem report

Vinod Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3982

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC on the basis of a genuine compromise between the parties, applying the principles under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute compromise

Jaswinder Singh Kohli & Ors v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3980

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a mediated settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying the inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute mediated settlement

Col Avtar Singh Malhotra v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3979

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 409 and 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while emphasizing the need for caution and justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement agreement Sections 409 and 420 IPC

Ajay v. State & Anr

01 May 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:3978

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC upon amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Institute of Public Health v. Union of India and Ors.

01 May 2015 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J · 2015:DHC:3992-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking to restrain government participation in a tobacco industry-sponsored tax conference, holding no law prohibits such participation absent statutory violation.

constitutional petition_dismissed Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3 FCTC Public Interest Litigation government participation

Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Anr

01 May 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:3988

The Delhi High Court directed the passport authorities to inquire into the status of a long-pending FIR before deciding on the petitioner’s passport re-issuance application, emphasizing procedural fairness and expedition.

administrative other passport re-issuance police verification FIR pendency Essential Commodities Act, 1955

Nirmal Fibres (P) Ltd. v. Northern Railways & Anr

01 May 2015 · Suresh Kait, J. · 2015:DHC:3991

The Delhi High Court directed Northern Railways to offload the petitioner's consignment at the rebooked station without levying demurrage charges, holding the railway liable for failure to perform after accepting payment.

civil petition_allowed consignment rebooking demurrage charges railway freight offloading station

Dr. Sharad Agarwal v. Lov Verma

01 May 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:3995

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for contempt against the respondent, holding that no willful disobedience occurred and due diligence was exercised in complying with the Court’s order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 willful disobedience due diligence Indian Medical Council Act, 1956

Balvir Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

01 May 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:3994

The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed writ petition challenging a 1994 promotion DPC, holding that delay bars relief and the DPC’s decision was not arbitrary or violative of reservation policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee Article 226 limitation and laches Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Gulzar Singh v. Guru Harkrishan Public School

01 May 2015 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2015:DHC:3993

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a five-month delay in filing an appeal before the Delhi School Tribunal, emphasizing that delay without malafide intent should ordinarily be condoned.

administrative petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation Delhi School Tribunal Article 226

Yatender Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

01 May 2015 · P. S. Teji · 2015:DHC:3996

Delhi High Court upheld conviction for rash and negligent driving causing death under Sections 279 and 304A IPC, modifying sentence to period already served with enhanced fine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rash and negligent driving Section 279 IPC Section 304A IPC eyewitness testimony

Balbir Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi)

01 May 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:3983

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape based solely on the credible and trustworthy testimony of the prosecutrix, emphasizing that absence of medical evidence or delay in FIR does not vitiate the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC

Ramesh v. The State

01 May 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:3984-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder based on a credible dying declaration recorded by a police officer, supported by corroborative evidence, rejecting the appellant's challenge on procedural and evidentiary grounds.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC murder burn injuries

Bikramjit Ahluwalia & Ors. v. Simran Ahluwalia & Anr.

01 May 2015 · V.P. Vaish · 2015:DHC:3985
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of a defamation complaint, holding that a prima facie case existed and that exceptions to defamation are to be decided at trial.

criminal petition_dismissed defamation Section 499 IPC Section 500 IPC Section 482 Cr.P.C.