Delhi High Court
82,660 judgments
W.P.rCI 4399/2015 v. SDMC
The Delhi High Court held that street vendors squatting at sites are protected from removal or relocation under the Street Vendors Act, 2014 until the survey is completed, and may approach the Town Vending Committee for relief.
46,50,51,54,55,56,59&60 v. Advs.for R-l/SDMC in 1-38
The Court directed constitution and functioning of the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014, holding it as the appropriate forum to resolve disputes and denied interim injunctions restraining eviction of street vendors.
Manohar Lal & Anr. v. The Registrar, Co-op. Group Housing Society and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Lieutenant Governor's valid exercise of power under Section 127 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 to grant a one-time exemption regularizing self-draws by cooperative housing societies, dismissing the writ petition for lack of locus and merit.
Ravinder Mohan v. Neeraj Singla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a partition suit by consent based on a settlement wherein the plaintiff was compensated Rs. 27 lakhs for his 1/5th share in the disputed property, extinguishing his rights upon full payment.
Medical Council of India v. Amma Chandravati Educational and Charitable Trust and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that applications for establishing medical colleges must be complete with mandatory documents by the prescribed cut-off date, and late submission of such documents cannot be accepted, upholding the Central Government's rejection of incomplete applications.
Sumitra Gupta v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition setting aside the attachment of property gifted before death, remanding the matter to the DRT to examine the petitioner’s ownership claim despite procedural defaults.
Anam v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that procedural discrepancies and unproven allegations do not justify revoking bail absent cogent evidence of misuse.
Bajaj Allianz Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sunil Kumar
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim, upheld insurer's liability despite insured's willful breach, and clarified apportionment among legal heirs.
Dalim Commercial Private Limited v. H S Projects Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties consented in writing and no secured creditors existed.
Apex Safety Glass Private Limited v. New Delhi Realcon Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed a joint application under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with the requirement of convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation where all parties had given written consent.
Eros Resorts and Hotels Limited v. Eros Grand Resorts & Hotels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Arrangement involving demerger between two companies under the Companies Act, 1956, after requisite approvals and no objections from the Regional Director.
American Express Foreign Exchange Services India Limited v. American Express Services India Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two American Express companies under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and regulatory undertakings.
Padmesh Realtors Private Limited v. Suncity Infrastructures Private Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for approval of a Scheme of Amalgamation under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 based on their written consents.
Mars Industries Private Limited v. Dorset India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Mars Industries Private Limited and Dorset India Private Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up and directing compliance with statutory requirements.
Pilani Soft Labs Private Limited v. Ibibo Group Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Pilani Soft Labs Private Limited and Ibibo Group Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, allowing dissolution of the transferor company without winding up.
Shiva Agro Private Limited v. GSC Glass Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Shiva Agro Private Limited and GSC Glass Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, after addressing procedural observations and imposing costs on the petitioners.
Kernel Systems Private Limited v. Arcop Associates Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Kernel Systems Private Limited and Arcop Associates Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956, affirming the petitioners' discretion in fixing the appointed date and dispensing with shareholder and creditor meetings.
Mount Echo Buildwell Private Limited v. Paramount Propbuild Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Mount Echo Buildwell Private Limited and Paramount Propbuild Private Limited under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dissolving the transferor company without winding up.
Vijay Kumar Gupta v. Lt Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the defendants to withdraw their Chamber Appeal and related applications against the Joint Registrar's order, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn upon their agreement to abide by the order and pay costs.
Saleem v. Jain (AE) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against SDMC and police, holding no willful disobedience of demolition orders, while directing timely compliance with police support.