Delhi High Court

81,413 judgments

Year:

B C Upreti & Anr. v. State & Anr.

16 Jul 2015 · Ashutosh Kumar · 2015:DHC:5655

The Delhi High Court upheld the revisional court's order directing framing of charges under section 498A IPC despite vague allegations, emphasizing that absence of specific dates does not render cruelty allegations groundless at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC Cruelty Dowry harassment Framing of charges

Murti Devi v. State

16 Jul 2015 · S.P. Garg · 2015:DHC:5663

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of Murti Devi for abetting rape due to inherent infirmities in the prosecution case, including delay in FIR, inconsistent testimony, and lack of corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC Section 109 IPC rape abetment

Ram Chander Shahni @ Chandan v. State

16 Jul 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:5649-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable testimony of child witnesses and corroborative forensic evidence, affirming that child witness testimony can suffice for conviction if credible.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child witness testimony Section 302 IPC murder conviction reliability of witnesses

TASLEEM v. STATE; ASHOK v. STATE

16 Jul 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:5652-DB

The judgment text provided is insufficient to extract substantive information or legal analysis.

other

TASLEEM v. STATE; ASHOK v. STATE

16 Jul 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2015:DHC:5650-DB

other

Samir Kumar Pujari v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jul 2015 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2015:DHC:5673

The Delhi High Court held that an employee holding a post on an ad-hoc basis with adverse performance reports is not entitled to time-scale promotion under Rule 11 of the OIDB Employees Regulations.

service_law petition_dismissed time-scale promotion ad-hoc service substantive post Annual Confidential Report

Harish @ Chirag v. State of Delhi

16 Jul 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:5680

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony, inadmissibility of electronic evidence, and evidence of a consensual relationship.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape consent prosecutrix testimony electronic evidence

Mukesh Kumar v. The Administrator (NZRE)

16 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:5662-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disputes involving past officers of a multi-State co-operative society relating to elections are arbitrable under Section 84 of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002, and allowed the appeal setting aside the dismissal of the Section 9 petition on maintainability grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 84 Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act arbitration Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act election dispute

HCLTECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

16 Jul 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:5661-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 147 beyond four years are invalid without failure to disclose material facts, quashing the notice issued to HCL Technologies regarding Software Licence Fee depreciation.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 147 Income Tax Act Section 148 Income Tax Act reassessment notice failure to disclose material facts

Jagdish v. Narender & Ors.

16 Jul 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:5682

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Delhi lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain a claim petition when neither the claimant nor the accident was located there, despite the insurance company's Delhi address.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 jurisdiction Motor Accident Claims Tribunal territorial jurisdiction

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rojida Khatun & Ors.

16 Jul 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2015:DHC:5681

The Delhi High Court dismissed cross-appeals challenging a MACT award as barred by time, holding that neither party showed sufficient cause to condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5 condonation of delay Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Rekha Mathur v. Manish Khanna

16 Jul 2015 · Vipin Sanghi · 2015:DHC:5684

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted a decree of nullity of marriage under Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of the respondent's impotence and non-consummation, holding that such dismissal is appealable and distinct from divorce under Section 13.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 12(1)(a) Section 13(1)(ia) nullity of marriage

Neelam Azad v. Om Dutt Kardam and Others

16 Jul 2015 · Hima Kohli · 2015:DHC:5664

The Delhi High Court dismissed a civil suit in default and for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's failure to appear despite a settlement reached through mediation.

civil appeal_dismissed default dismissal non-prosecution civil suit mediation settlement

Ravinder Pal Singh @ Rishi & Ors. v. The State & Anr

16 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5671

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute based on a mediated settlement, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC mediated settlement matrimonial dispute

Davesh Kumar v. State

16 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5670

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to summon his mother as an accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., holding that contradictory evidence did not warrant her summoning.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning additional accused contradictory evidence destruction of evidence

Rajni & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5669

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in non-heinous offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement compoundable offences

Mohini Sharma v. State

16 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5668

The Delhi High Court held that sanction under Section 140 of the Delhi Police Act is mandatory before prosecuting a police officer for defamation allegedly committed during official duties, and the trial court must consider this at the summoning stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant sanction public servant Section 197 CrPC Section 140 Delhi Police Act

Kamla v. State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Jul 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:5665

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s interim bail application in an NDPS case, holding that availability of other family members to care for the ailing husband negated the need for bail.

criminal petition_dismissed interim bail NDPS case medical grounds care of family member

Anupam Bhatnagar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Jul 2015 · G. Rohini; Jayant Nath · 2015:DHC:5674-DB

The Delhi High Court directed immediate removal of garbage by police-supervised task forces and restrained Safai Karamcharis from obstructing the process, while declining to adjudicate salary payment issues pending in another petition.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation garbage removal Safai Karamcharis strike

Directorate General of Hydrocarbons Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas v. M/S Aambience Exim (P) Ltd.

16 Jul 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:5678-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the lessee liable for service tax payments under a lease agreement, affirming that statutory tax liability can be contractually shifted and such awards are not liable to be set aside absent patent illegality.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant service tax liability lease agreement contractual shifting of tax arbitral award