Delhi High Court
80,866 judgments
Subhash Chand v. M/s Parkash Enterprises
The Delhi High Court modified an award of reinstatement to grant monetary compensation when the employer's establishment had closed, upholding recovery proceedings and emphasizing proper adjudication of unclaimed benefits.
Braun Textiles Processors v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellants to withdraw their customs appeals with liberty to file properly constituted appeals in the future.
Anjali Kapur Gonsalves v. Madhuri Kapur Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint, holding that the suit discloses a cause of action against them and requires trial on allegations of fraudulent sale and misrepresentation.
SAC HIN JAIN & ORS v. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 498A IPC based on settlement and divorce but refused to quash a serious offence FIR under Sections 376 and related provisions, directing expedited investigation.
Sukhdta Chits Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Shrajender Prasad Gupta
The High Court dismissed petitions challenging the trial court's refusal to allow replacement of an unqualified handwriting expert after closure of defence evidence, affirming the limited scope of interference under Article 227.
Lokesh Mishra v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court emphasized the urgent need for effective implementation of mass awareness and sensitization programs by government agencies to combat sexual offences against women and children, lamenting slow progress and imposing costs on the Delhi Government.
Abdul Rashid v. Delhi Waqf Board
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for injunction due to non-joinder of the Union of India, holding that injunction cannot be granted to a trespasser without settled possession against the true owner.
Union of India and Ors v. Yogender Mittal
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of a government officer's transfer order for being arbitrary and violative of transfer guidelines, affirming limited judicial interference in transfer matters absent mala fide or violation of norms.
Vijay Risbud v. CBI
The Delhi High Court modified bail conditions to permit the petitioner’s foreign travel with safeguards, balancing his professional needs and the trial’s integrity.
Constable Ram Kishan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from service and refused to condone delay, upholding the Central Administrative Tribunal's order on grounds of delay and lack of merit.
OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD. v. AMTEK GEOPHYSICAL PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed ONGC's appeal, upholding the arbitral award granting AMTEK standby charges and other claims due to force majeure from terrorist threats, affirming the finality of reasonable arbitral contract interpretation.
Ravi Jain & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and divorce by mutual consent.
Bhagat Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed conviction under Sections 325/341/34 IPC but modified the sentence by releasing the petitioners on probation considering their antecedents, compensation to the victim, and victim's consent.
Mahender Singh v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Titoo v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for the brutal murder of his mother and causing injuries to his brother, affirming that intentional lethal injuries with a household utensil constitute murder under Section 302 IPC.
Mohd. Shakil & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act based on a mediated settlement, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to end futile criminal proceedings in amicably resolved matrimonial cases.
Sunil Joshi v. GNCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 324, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles of inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
G.S. Gill v. State & Anr.
The High Court declined to quash the summoning order under Sections 468/471 IPC, holding that the petitioner must raise his pleas at the charge stage and granted interim exemption from personal appearance subject to conditions.
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III
The Delhi High Court granted unconditional stay of service tax demand against HPCL relying on a prior CESTAT judgment holding that HPCL was not liable to pay service tax under Business Auxiliary Services for marketing CNG.
Pradeep Kumar & Ors. v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.