Delhi High Court

76,343 judgments

Year:

Council of the Instt. of Chartered Accountants of India v. Anil Kumar & Anr.

05 May 2010 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:610-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action removing a Chartered Accountant's name from the register for professional misconduct in certifying inconsistent audit reports without proper verification.

professional_regulatory other Significant Chartered Accountant professional misconduct audit report verification

Alok Punj Vidya Peeth (Regd) Society Nehru Adarsh Vidyalaya v. Government of NCT of Delhi

21 Apr 2010 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:814
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to hand over management of Alok Punj Secondary School to the petitioner society as per an unchallenged LG order, subject to repairs and post-Board exams.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition management of school Lieutenant Governor order Directorate of Education

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Om Kanwar

13 Apr 2010 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:296-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed DTC's appeal, holding that the domestic inquiry against Om Kanwar was valid and granting approval for his removal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) domestic inquiry principles of natural justice

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Om Kanwar

13 Apr 2010 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:295-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed DTC's appeal, holding that the domestic inquiry against Om Kanwar was valid and granting approval for his removal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) domestic inquiry principles of natural justice

Union of India and Another v. Sh. Vivek Gupta and Others

18 Mar 2010 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9057-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The court upheld that an employee exonerated from disciplinary proceedings is entitled to seniority benefits from the original promotion recommendation date despite joining service later.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee seniority disciplinary proceedings sealed cover

Latika v. Staff Selection Commission and Ors.

17 Feb 2010 · Sanjiv Khanna; A.K. Chawla · 2017:DHC:5767-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing consideration of the petitioner’s candidature as OBC despite late submission of the certificate, emphasizing constitutional principles of reservation and administrative fairness.

administrative petition_allowed Significant OBC certificate reservation late submission undertaking

Union of India & Ors. v. P.S. Gosain

12 Feb 2010 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7865-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 33

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Tribunal's order granting pay parity to respondents identically situated to those in the Sridharan case, emphasizing the finality of judicial decisions and the principle of extending benefits to similarly placed persons.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation stepping up of pay Fundamental Rule 22 identically situated persons

Rajat Joon v. Rajinder Singh Joon

03 Feb 2010 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023 SCC OnLine TS 4494
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed an application by a non-party legal heir to lead evidence challenging a compromise decree on grounds of collusion and clarified the effect of adoption on inheritance rights under Section 12 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act.

civil other Significant compromise decree Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC locus standi collusion

ARUN SHARMA v. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION

25 Jan 2010 · V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2017:DHC:2103

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement of a terminated employee, holding that ministry advice to consider reinstatement is not binding and recruitment rules must be followed.

administrative petition_dismissed termination of service reinstatement public sector undertaking government ministry advice

Chandan Kumar Chatterjee v. Ministry of Communication and Ors.

12 Jan 2010 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2021:DHC:1200

The Delhi High Court held that a pensioner who commuted 100% pension is not entitled to arrears for the pre-restoration period prior to pension restoration after 15 years, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for such arrears.

civil petition_dismissed Significant pension commutation pension restoration arrears of pension 5th Pay Commission

V. Sreenivas v. M/S. Felex Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

03 Nov 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:424-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a settlement discharging a contract containing an arbitration clause creates a fresh cause of action independent of the original contract, and granted leave to defend a summary suit based on dishonored cheques issued pursuant to such settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause discharge of contract accord and satisfaction summary suit

Ashok Sikka v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

28 Oct 2009 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:1747

The High Court dismissed the appeal holding the suit challenging demolition by SDMC officials barred by six-month limitation under Section 478 of the Delhi Municipal Act, 1957, as the demolition was done in discharge of official duties pursuant to court orders.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Municipal Act, 1957 Section 478 limitation Order VII Rule 11 CPC demolition

Nitin Kumar v. M/S Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd

26 Oct 2009 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1622

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that gratuity is payable only after five years of continuous service under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and the suit claiming gratuity after two years’ service was barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4(1) gratuity entitlement limitation period

Bry-Air Prokon SAGL & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

13 Oct 2009 · Jyoti Singh · 2022:DHC:4439
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of six patent applications and a lapsed patent due to negligence of the Patent Agent, holding that courts may condone delay in extraordinary circumstances under writ jurisdiction despite mandatory statutory timelines.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant patent abandonment First Examination Report FER patent restoration

Shakti Nath and Ors. v. Alpha Tiger Cyprus Investments No. 3 Ltd and Ors.

10 Oct 2009 · S. Muralidhar · 2017:DHC:775
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an ICC arbitration award dismissing challenges to arbitrator appointments as time-barred and affirmed the award as a valid claim for damages, not an enforcement of put option rights violating FEMA.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ICC Rules challenge to arbitrator Section 34 petition

Hemant Tyagi v. UCO Bank & Ors.

05 Oct 2009 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6283

The Delhi High Court held that a public sector bank cannot enforce bond money against an employee who left service to join another government organization without obtaining a fresh bond, and directed refund of the bond amount paid.

administrative petition_allowed Significant bond enforcement public sector enterprises Department of Public Enterprises Office Memorandum refund of bond money

Vivek Kaushik v. Vikram Kaushik & Anr

03 Sep 2009 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:270-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove an oral family settlement and ownership rights over disputed properties, affirming that clear evidence is essential to establish such settlements.

property appeal_dismissed Significant oral family settlement partition property ownership intestate succession

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Laavanya Kaushik; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Babu Lal Meena

04 Aug 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:688-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's condonation of delay in filing an OA for non-declaration of ST category results, holding that limitation did not commence as the cause of action persisted.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Scheduled Tribe vacancies

Inderjeet Singh v. Kamala Nehru College & Ors.

11 Jul 2009 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7079
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that a dissent based on erroneous eligibility criteria cannot invalidate a selection and quashed the direction to re-advertise, directing appointment as per the original merit list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Selection Committee Assistant Professor appointment UGC Regulations 2018 Eligibility criteria

Sudhanshu and Ors v. Union of India and Anr

25 Jun 2009 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2806-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 100

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to their exclusion from overseas deployment due to their promotion zone status, upholding the binding executive policy restricting such deployment.

administrative petition_dismissed deployment abroad promotion zone Promotion Cadre Course executive policy