Delhi High Court
76,521 judgments
Neetu Singh & Anr. v. Rajeev Saumitra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, holding that mere apprehensions without sufficient cause do not justify transferring a civil suit to another court.
Mohan Batra v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Sections 288 and 304A IPC on the basis of a full settlement and compensation paid to the victim's family, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Deepak Nanda v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two appellants for triple murder based on admissible fingerprint and circumstantial evidence despite procedural lapses in investigation.
Milind Madhukar Bhusari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to make a fresh representation against his transfer after the disciplinary chargesheet was quashed, directing the respondents to consider it sympathetically, but dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.
UOI v. NIRUPMA KUMAR
This judgment records the final decision on multiple writ petitions filed by the Union of India challenging administrative actions before the Delhi High Court.
UOI v. NIRUPMA KUMAR
The Delhi High Court delivered a reserved judgment on writ petitions filed by the Union of India against various respondents concerning administrative matters.
UOI v. Manisha Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the 1987 Railway Board circular fixing IRAS direct recruits' seniority based on combined UPSC exam and probationary training performance, setting aside the CAT's contrary order.
Sunil & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Union of India & Ors v. Babita
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing compassionate appointment for the son of a deceased temporary employee with 20 years of continuous service, emphasizing the protective intent of relevant service rules.
Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Government of NCT of Delhi to take a timely decision on fee fixation recommendations under the 2007 Act for a private professional institute, addressing undue delay.
Anil Narang v. Molly Kapoor
The Delhi High Court decreed a summary suit based on a court-mediated settlement and granted refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
S Kanwaljit Singh & Anr v. Molly Kapoor
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order and decreed a suit for specific performance based on a court annexed mediated settlement, granting refund of court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act.
Sunil Choudhary & Anr v. Molly Kapoor
The Delhi High Court granted specific performance based on a settlement and affidavit undertaking, revived the suit after breach, and allowed refund of court fees upon amicable resolution of a property dispute.
Joginder Singh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Dowry Prohibition Act on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Gaurav Karamkr v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Vidur Kaistha v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to do so in appropriate cases.
Gaurav Puri & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and serve ends of justice.
Manpreet Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a copyright infringement FIR under Section 482 CrPC based on a settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down in Gian Singh and Narinder Singh regarding quashing non-compoundable offences upon compromise.
Rajiv Joshi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.