Delhi High Court

75,184 judgments

Year:

Mehdul v. State (NCT of Delhi)

10 Dec 2015 · Indermeet Kaur · 2015:DHC:10099

Arindam Bose & Anr. v. State & Anr.

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10094

SRF LTD. v. State

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10095

Sameer Saxena & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10098

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Section 507 IPC and Section 66A IT Act arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Ranjiv Kapoor v. State of NCT, Delhi

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10097

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed further.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC voluntarily causing hurt

Dr. Jai Moal Kurian v. Central Board of Secondary Education

10 Dec 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:10088

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a name error in the petitioner’s Class XII CBSE certificate beyond the prescribed ten-year limitation period, directing the Board to amend the certificate to prevent hardship in academic progression.

administrative petition_allowed Significant CBSE certificate correction name discrepancy limitation period administrative rule

Sameer Saxena & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10087

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and dissolution of marriage, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

SRF LTD. v. State

10 Dec 2015 · Suresh Kait · 2015:DHC:10089

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings for lack of territorial jurisdiction and abuse of process where the alleged offence occurred in the USA and the complainant failed to appear for years.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. territorial jurisdiction quashing of complaint abuse of process

Retail Royalty Company v. Pantaloons Fashion & Retail Limited

10 Dec 2015 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2015:DHC:10090-DB

The Delhi High Court held that while the word 'EAGLE' cannot be exclusively appropriated, the respondents' use of deceptively similar Eagle Devices infringed the appellant's trademark rights, granting partial injunction accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement deceptive similarity composite marks Eagle Device

Pradip Ghosh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2015 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2015:DHC:10091

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning delay in furnishing administration and surety bonds in probate proceedings where no prejudice was caused to the State.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay administration bond surety bond probate

MODERN MALLEABLES LTD v. UOI

10 Dec 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:10092-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the AAIFR to consider the petitioner's application originally filed before the non-functioning BIFR, ensuring procedural justice under Article 227.

administrative petition_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction merger/amalgamation scheme

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. DR. V.K. VERMA

10 Dec 2015 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:10108-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order holding that a one-year extension of service granted before superannuation must be counted for pension and retirement benefits, rejecting the government's attempt to reclassify it as re-employment and recover payments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant extension of service re-employment superannuation pensionary benefits

Saroj Bidawat v. Abdul Gaffar & Ors.

10 Dec 2015 · Sunita Gupta · 2015:DHC:10171
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award directing regularisation of long-serving muster roll workers and held their termination without statutory compliance illegal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant regularisation muster roll workers industrial disputes equal pay for equal work

Dr. V.P. Sharma v. Dr. Poonam Sharma

09 Dec 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:10077-DB

RUDERASREY SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

09 Dec 2015 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2015:DHC:10079-DB

Lokender Kumar Tyagi v. Union of India and Ors.

09 Dec 2015 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2015:DHC:10078-DB

Meenu Gupta v. Union of India

09 Dec 2015 · Sunil Gaur · 2015:DHC:10048