Delhi High Court

74,231 judgments

Year:

Pargat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Jan 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2016:DHC:9103-DB

Saroj Bala Sapra & Ors. v. Amar Preet Singh Chadha & Anr.

21 Dec 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:8119

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) does not permit complete demolition and reconstruction, and tenants raising serious triable issues are entitled to leave to defend eviction petitions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction leave to defend

State v. Mohit

21 Dec 2015 · Sanjiv Khanna; R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:8118-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual offence case due to failure of prosecution to prove the prosecutrix's minority and inconsistencies in evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant age of prosecutrix sexual offences benefit of doubt contradictory evidence

Emerson Process Management Power and Water Solutions Inc v. Controller of Patents

21 Dec 2015 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8871

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of software-related patent applications based on obsolete grounds and remanded them for fresh consideration under current Patent Office guidelines.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Patents Act, 1970 patent application computer software patent novelty

Smt Jodhian (Since Deceased Through LRs) & Ors. v. Methodist Church in India

16 Dec 2015 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:334

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the respondent's ownership and rejecting the appellants' plea of adverse possession and bar of suit under Order II Rule 2 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession Order II Rule 2 CPC concurrent findings of fact mandatory injunction

Bhim Rao Yadav and Anr v. Chairman-cum-Managing Director and Ors

16 Dec 2015 · C. Hari Shankar; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:8803-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's non-adjudicatory orders and remanded the petitioners' overtime allowance claim for fresh consideration on merits.

labor appeal_allowed overtime allowance Delhi Transport Corporation Tribunal jurisdiction remand

Saroj Gambhir v. Jaipal Singh Tanwar

14 Dec 2015 · V.K. Shali, J. · 2016:DHC:7967

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging eviction where the tenant was personally served and failed to file leave to defend within time, rejecting allegations of fraud and invalid service.

property appeal_dismissed eviction leave to defend service of notice Delhi Rent Control Act

Sushila Devi Jain v. Rajinder Kumar Gupta

11 Dec 2015 · V.K. Shali, J. · 2016:DHC:7965

The Delhi High Court dismissed the landlord’s revision petition, holding that the tenant raised triable issues on bona fide requirement warranting leave to defend in the eviction proceeding.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition leave to defend triable issue

Sushila Devi Jain v. Adesh Kumar Gupta

11 Dec 2015 · V.K. Shali · 2016:DHC:7966

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of leave to defend to the tenant in an eviction petition, holding that disputed facts about alternative accommodation and bona fide requirement raised triable issues requiring trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition leave to defend alternative accommodation

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS v. UDAL SINGH

30 Oct 2015 · C. HARI SHANKAR; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:8855-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a teacher on the ground that the chargesheet and punishment were issued by authorities lacking jurisdiction under the CCS (CCA) Rules after his elevation to Group 'B' status.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings competent authority Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 Group B officers

M/S DRS LOGISTICS (P) LTD & ANR. v. GOOGLE INDIA PVT LTD & ORS.

27 Oct 2015 · V. KAMESWAR RAO · 2021:DHC:3482

The Delhi High Court held that use of registered trademarks as backend keywords in Google's advertising platform does not constitute trademark infringement or passing off, and Google is entitled to intermediary protection under the IT Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement keywords meta-tags Google AdWords

IACUITY TELCO SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.

27 Oct 2015 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7081
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that the plea of limitation cannot be decided at the stage of appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed reference of disputes to arbitration under DIAC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Limitation Appointment of arbitrator

M/S ABL BIOTECHNOLOGIES LTD & ORS v. M/S TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR

23 Oct 2015 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7277

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by an arbitrator unilaterally appointed by one party, holding such appointment invalid even before the 2015 amendment to the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment arbitral award nullity ab initio

Chirag Stock and Securities Pvt. Limited v. Union of India & Anr.

29 Sep 2015 · J.R. Midha · 2016:DHC:8321

The Delhi High Court issued procedural orders in an arbitration petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Chirag Stock and Securities Pvt. Limited against Union of India, with no substantive decision recorded in the provided text.

civil other Procedural Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration petition