Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Prabhakiran Jain v. M/S S. R. Jewels Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a mediated settlement subsumes the original complaint under Section 138 NI Act, and breach of such settlement cannot be prosecuted through a fresh complaint but must be enforced through execution or contempt proceedings.
MS MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. ALETHIA INFOTEL PRIVATE LIMITED
The Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and not merits of the dispute.
M/S Sheetal and Sons v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging GST demand orders for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 must be availed before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Khushant Nagpal
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to a youthful accused involved as a minor participant in gold smuggling, dismissing the petition seeking recall on grounds of investigation pendency and offence gravity.
Rajendra Kumar Sahu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition to enable filing of a fresh petition with additional details and disposed of the original petition as withdrawn.
Ramchander v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that after setting aside an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, the remedy lies within the arbitration regime and not through a writ petition under Article 226, dismissing the appellant's claim for refund via writ jurisdiction.
Rajeev Seth v. State of Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that deletion of a party from a suit at the petitioner's risk is valid, but procedural fairness requires applications to be listed and parties heard before orders are passed, setting aside an order passed without hearing.
M/S DOLLAR INDUSTRIES LTD. v. VARISH AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting the distributor to dispose of unsold stock pending trial, as the manufacturer refused to take back goods or issue credit notes, leaving substantive disputes for trial.
Banson Enterprises & Anr. v. Assistant Commissioner CGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order involving fraudulent ITC claims, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Sharma v. KM Lavi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-review medical examination for a police constable candidate declared unfit due to fungal infection, emphasizing the need for a conclusive medical opinion on fitness relative to job duties.
Sh Ved Prakash Anand v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that issuance of a departmental charge memo after retirement without meeting statutory conditions under Rule 9 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 is barred by limitation and quashed the charge memo and related tribunal order.
Delhi Development Authority v. Gammon Engineers and Contractors Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that non-filing of the arbitral award with a Section 34 application renders the filing non-est, causing the limitation period to continue running and barring the challenge if filed beyond the prescribed period.
Mahadev Enterprises v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand order issued beyond limitation without personal hearing, pending Supreme Court's decision on validity of extension notification under Section 168A CGST Act.
KRISHNA TRADERS v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court upheld the GST demand order after considering the reply but allowed the petitioner to file a timely appeal pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act.
Sulender Shah and Anr. v. Additional Commissioner / Joint Commissioner CGST Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Show Cause Notice and held that judicial interference is not warranted at the pre-adjudication stage where the notice specifies the tax and penalty amounts.
M/S K-NXT LOGISTICX PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that refund sanctioned by the Appellate Authority under CGST Act cannot be withheld solely on departmental opinion under Section 54(11) without a pending appeal, directing immediate refund with interest.
Praveen Sain v. The Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of appointment on grounds that a candidate cannot rectify an inadvertent caste category mistake or produce caste certificates after the cut-off date in a recruitment process.
North East Centre for Technology Application and Reach v. M/S Rhino Bamboo Industry
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed and thus ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Deepak Kumar Yadav; Rekha Rani Yadav v. Mohit Jain
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
Dilip Rawal v. M/s Mothers Pride Education Personna Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order of the Commercial Court, holding that Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act bars such revision petitions and that Article 227 jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly.