Delhi High Court

74,231 judgments

Year:

ULTRA HOME CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD v. PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHAUBEY & ORS

20 Jan 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:457-DB

The Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to entertain a trademark infringement suit where the cause of action arises at the plaintiff's subordinate office location where it carries on business, requiring the suit to be filed there and not at the principal office.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction trade mark infringement carrying on business principal office

Gyanendra Kumar v. Union of India

20 Jan 2016 · Hima Kohli; Sunil Gaur

Delhi High Court directs CISF to pay House Rent Allowance to personnel permitted to live outside official accommodation when no government housing is provided, affirming earlier binding precedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant House Rent Allowance CISF Government accommodation Writ of mandamus

Through: Mr. N. Mahabir and Mr P.C. Arya, Advocate v. CHIKITSABROTI UDYOG (SANJIVAN HOSPITAL) & ORS

20 Jan 2016 · JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR; 23.03.2017 · 2017:DHC:1704

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to enforce an interim award and appointed a Local Commissioner with police assistance to remove hypothecated medical equipment from Respondents' premises.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition interim relief jurisdiction

B. C. Jain v. Rajinder & Ors.

19 Jan 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:446

Udit Mehra & Ors. v. State & Anr.

19 Jan 2016 · Siddharth Mridul, J · 2016:DHC:454-DB

M/S Amaan Tanners & Anr v. Union of India & Ors

19 Jan 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:433

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of financial assistance under the Tannery Modernization Scheme due to disputed factual issues, leaving open the petitioners' right to pursue other legal remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Tannery Modernization Scheme financial assistance government scheme eligibility writ petition

M/S SHESH NARAYAN SHYAM NARAYAN v. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER (ADMN), DEPTT. OF FOOD & SUPPLIES & ANR

19 Jan 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:434

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging suspension of a Fair Price Shop license, holding that disputed factual issues cannot be decided in writ proceedings and upholding the administrative orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Fair Price Shop license suspension Delhi Specified Articles Order 1981 writ petition

M/S KEI INDUSTIRES LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

19 Jan 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:435

Delhi High Court directs DGFT to reconsider petitioner's refund claim under Foreign Trade Policy afresh, following relevant precedents and affording hearing.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Foreign Trade Policy refund claim Director General of Foreign Trade opportunity of hearing

Riazuddin @ Ramesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Jan 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:423-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Riazuddin for the murder of his wife based on circumstantial evidence and recovery of body parts and weapon, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC disclosure statement

M/S KEI INDUSTIRES LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

19 Jan 2016 · Manmohan J · 2016:DHC:436

The Delhi High Court directed the DGFT to reconsider the petitioner's refund application under the Foreign Trade Policy afresh, after hearing and in accordance with relevant precedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Foreign Trade Policy refund application Director General of Foreign Trade opportunity of hearing

Tayeeb v. Kauhhar & Anr.

19 Jan 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2016:DHC:448

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing the husband to pay maintenance to his wife and minor daughter under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing jurisdictional and procedural objections.

family petition_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance desertion jurisdiction

Shail Sahni v. Valsa Sara Mathew & Ors.

19 Jan 2016 · Manmohan · 2016:DHC:431

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the CIC’s refusal to interfere with vague and omnibus RTI requests, emphasizing the need to balance the right to information with administrative efficiency and preventing misuse of the RTI Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act RTI vague RTI requests abuse of process

Riazuddin @ Ramesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Jan 2016 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:451-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Riazuddin for the murder of his wife based on credible circumstantial evidence, recovery of body parts, and corroborated disclosure statement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC disclosure statement

Rajesh Shahi v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

19 Jan 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:452-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC and Article 226 of the Constitution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Article 226 Constitution matrimonial dispute

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Pawan Sharma & Ors.

19 Jan 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:450-DB

The High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a dowry death case, holding that prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment soon before death as required under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304-B IPC Section 498-A IPC cruelty

State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) v. Bipin Kumar Paswan

19 Jan 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:449-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a kidnapping and rape case, holding that the prosecutrix's inconsistent and non-corroborated testimony did not inspire confidence to convict.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant prosecutrix testimony kidnapping rape Section 363 IPC

MD Shakeel v. The State NCT of Delhi

19 Jan 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:455-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable last seen circumstantial evidence, failure to explain parting from the deceased, and recovery of weapon at his instance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC Section 106 Evidence Act

Nepal Singh v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr

19 Jan 2016 · Suresh Kait · 2016:DHC:422

Delhi High Court dismissed petition to quash FIR alleging misappropriation by Society Secretary, holding limitation and jurisdiction objections unsustainable and refusing premature interference with ongoing investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR limitation jurisdiction