Delhi High Court
73,320 judgments
Priyanka Rani v. Government of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioner’s candidature for Nursing Officer due to non-compliance with the prescribed validity period of OBC (NCL) certificates as mandated by the recruitment advertisement and official notices.
Pradeep Agarwal v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that where a plea of fraud was already taken in the original securitization application, amendment to add the same plea may be refused, but the party can clarify it in replication, and the Tribunal shall consider it on merits.
Hitesh Chhabra & Anr. v. Sandeep Chhabra
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator upon failure of parties to agree, limiting its role to verifying the arbitration agreement and timeliness of the petition.
Sandeep Sharma v. Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed the removal order of an employee due to procedural irregularities and lack of evidence in the departmental inquiry, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
AGP City Gas Private Limited & Anr. v. Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that exclusivity granted to Authorized Entities under PNGRB Act is limited to pipeline CGD networks, allowing LNG stations dispensing LNG in liquid form by others, and upheld the Board's regulatory authority to balance exclusivity with consumer interests.
Bennet, Coleman and Company Ltd v. Fashion One Television LLC
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent's trademark registrations containing the dominant element "NOW" in Class 38 infringe the petitioner's "NOW" family of marks and ordered their removal from the register.
Shailendra Garg v. K-7 Impex Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court modified a summary suit decree based on cheques and promissory notes, rejecting the appellant's defence involving a separate company and reducing the interest rate, while affirming the requirement of triable issues for leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.
Vardhman Precision Profiles v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting claims as non-arbitrable due to failure to comply with contractual notification requirements, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Green Edge Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Magic Eye Developers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising from interlinked agreements containing arbitration clauses are prima facie arbitrable and directed reference to arbitration, clarifying the limited scope of judicial review under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.
Asha Rani Gupta v. Ravindera Memorial Public School & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a private school employee without prior approval of the Directorate of Education is void, and ex post facto approval cannot validate such dismissal.
S K Mukherjee & Anr v. Harvinder Pal Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for specific performance of a property sale agreement, holding that acceptance of payment beyond the original date extended the contract timeline and allowing equitable enhancement of sale consideration.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Anr v. Sushila and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting family pension to the widow of a casual laborer, affirming that long service in casual capacity is deemed permanent for pension benefits.
Rajdeep Kaur v. Gurmeet Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the wife's appeal, holding that neither cruelty nor desertion was proved and that her leaving the matrimonial home was constructive desertion due to the husband's untreated depression and alcoholism.
AB Mauri India Private Limited v. Vicky Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'TOWER' for dry fruits, enforcing a prior undertaking and finding prima facie trademark infringement under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act.
Shikha Sharma v. Guru Harkrishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to 6th and 7th CPC benefits under Section 10 of the DSE Act, rejecting financial hardship and fee revision approval as preconditions.
Charanjit Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School
The Delhi High Court directed the school to pay arrears and terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC to the petitioner’s late husband’s estate with interest, affirming statutory entitlement and timelines for compliance.
Daljeet Kaur Bindra & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Jasneet Kaur & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed unaided private school employees to be paid arrears and terminal benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations with interest, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education
Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.
Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.