Delhi High Court

73,683 judgments

Year:

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD v. HASEENA BEGUM

17 Feb 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1329

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s award of compensation in a motor accident claim, ruling that the vehicle owner was absolved of liability despite the driver holding a fake license, as due diligence was exercised, and affirmed the deduction of 50% for personal expenses in loss of dependency calculation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation driving license due diligence

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Rajesh Grover & Ors.

17 Feb 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1325

The Delhi High Court upheld 100% permanent functional disability for compensation but reduced the award by excluding reimbursed medical expenses and adjusting income after tax, while rejecting contributory negligence plea.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability loss of earning capacity medical expenses reimbursement

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sukh Devi & Ors.

17 Feb 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1326

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding the registered owner liable for compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act despite unproven claims of prior vehicle transfer.

motor_vehicles / civil appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 163-A insurance liability registered owner

M/S CRESENT ELECTRO SECURITY SYSTEMS PVT.LTD v. M/S BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD

17 Feb 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:1323

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claims for interim relief and appointment of arbitrator over intellectual property rights in a government security project, holding that the dispute was settled by prior compromise and no live claim survives.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 11 appointment of arbitrator Intellectual Property Rights

M/S CRESENT ELECTRO SECURITY SYSTEMS PVT.LTD v. M/S BROADCAST ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD

17 Feb 2016 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2016:DHC:1322

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking interim relief and appointment of arbitrator over intellectual property disputes, holding that prior compromise settlement barred any live claims or arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 interim relief Section 11 appointment of arbitrator Intellectual Property Rights

Udaibir v. State

17 Feb 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:1321-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a convict who absconded after bail, holding that the High Court's inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC permit dismissal of appeals to prevent evasion of sentence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC absconding appellant dismissal of appeal culpable homicide

Sanjay Jain v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

17 Feb 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:1324-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a dowry harassment FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Israr @ Sonu & Ors. v. State & Anr.

17 Feb 2016 · Siddharth Mridul · 2016:DHC:1320-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following reconciliation between the married parties and withdrawal of related petitions, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Kartikay Bulk Movers Private Limited v. Hind Hotels Private Limited

17 Feb 2016 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2016:DHC:1331

The Delhi High Court approved a scheme of amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings due to unanimous stakeholder consent.

corporate appeal_allowed scheme of amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 Board of Directors approval

A.K. Paswan v. Union of India and Ors.

17 Feb 2016 · Sanjiv Khanna; Najmi Waziri · 2016:DHC:1332-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of antedated promotion and upheld that financial upgradation under ACP does not guarantee promotion if the employee is found unsuitable by the Departmental Promotion Committee.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Departmental Promotion Committee Screening Committee

Bahadur Singh Yadav v. Mahender Pal Gupta

17 Feb 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1333

The Delhi High Court upheld the ex parte motor accident compensation award against the registered owner, holding that proper service and statutory ownership transfer requirements were complied with, dismissing the petition and appeal.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Order 9 Rule 13 CPC Service of notice

Honda Cars India Limited v. Deputy Comm. of Income Tax & Anr.

17 Feb 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:1308-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a draft assessment order under Section 144C(1) of the Income-tax Act can only be passed if the assessee is an "eligible assessee" as defined under Section 144C(15)(b), and quashed the draft order passed against Honda Cars India Limited which was not an eligible assessee.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 144C(1) Income-tax Act eligible assessee Transfer Pricing Officer draft assessment order

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Hindustan Construction Co Ltd

17 Feb 2016 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2016:DHC:1309-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award despite procedural objections regarding venue change and dissenting arbitrator's absence, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition majority arbitral award venue of arbitration

Indian Radiological and Imaging Association v. Union of India

17 Feb 2016 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2016:DHC:1311-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the PNDT Act does not empower the government to prescribe additional qualifications or training for ultrasound operators beyond MCI-recognized medical qualifications, invalidating rules mandating six months training or competency tests.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant PNDT Act ultrasound machine sonologist medical qualifications

Saraswati v. Press Trust of India and Anr.

17 Feb 2016 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Deepa Sharma · 2016:DHC:1310-DB

The Delhi High Court held that termination of a probationer based on bona fide unsuitability without departmental inquiry or compliance with Section 25F is valid and not retrenchment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant probationer termination industrial disputes act Section 25F retrenchment

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Ankita & Ors.

17 Feb 2016 · R. K. Gauba · 2016:DHC:1334

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal challenging the quantum of compensation in a motor accident death claim, upholding inclusion of future prospects and dependency of the deceased's father.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation loss of dependency future prospects

BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. SUPERTECH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD

17 Feb 2016 · Manmohan Singh · 2016:DHC:8291

The Delhi High Court appointed an advocate as sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with parties' consent, directing arbitration under DIAC in compliance with the 2015 Amendment Ordinance.

civil petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 Delhi International Arbitration Centre

SHARMA FABRICATORS AND ERECTORS P LTD v. BILT GRAPHICPAPERPRODUCTS LIMITED

17 Feb 2016 · MANMOHAN SINGH · 2016:DHC:8293

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by consent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing compliance with the 2015 Amendment Ordinance and institutional fee rules.

civil petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 sole arbitrator

Roopa Khanna v. Anil Varma & Anr

17 Feb 2016 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2016:DHC:8482

The Delhi High Court disposed of family property suits by consent, declaring ownership shares and granting a right of pre-emption under Section 22 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

civil appeal_allowed Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 22 right of pre-emption ownership shares

State v. Pawan @ Hawaldar

17 Feb 2016 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2016:DHC:1336-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a murder case, holding that the sole eyewitness testimony was not sufficiently reliable to overturn the Trial Court's judgment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant sole eyewitness testimony Section 302 IPC acquittal appellate interference