Delhi High Court
72,805 judgments
Rahul & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vinod Singh Yadav v. M/S Securitans India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the Labour Court in Delhi has jurisdiction to adjudicate the industrial dispute as part of the cause of action accrued in Delhi, setting aside the order declining jurisdiction.
Arvind Kaushik v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed a school to admit an EWS student and provide mandatory educational benefits, enforcing the student's right to free and compulsory education.
Pankaj Bansal v. Commissioner of Customs (Import) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the release of goods retained by Customs authorities following the Settlement Commission's order settling dues and penalties, emphasizing mandatory compliance with such orders.
Union of India v. Suresh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision quashing recovery of excess MACP payments from a retired employee without prior notice, reaffirming Supreme Court precedents protecting employees from retrospective pay reductions absent fraud or knowledge.
Commissioner of Customs Air Cargo Customs (Import) v. Escorts Heart Institute & Research Centre
The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act is mandatory when invoked in the Show Cause Notice for mis-declaration, and set aside the CESTAT order deleting the penalty.
Raj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Ratiram v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, granting the petitioner a declaration accordingly.
Ajab Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years from the award date.
Gajinder v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years, declaring the petitioner’s acquisition proceedings lapsed due to non-payment.
SAMO v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of physical possession.
Balraj v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, regardless of possession claims.
Gajraj Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation remains unpaid for over five years, granting the petitioner a declaration to that effect.
BPI (India) Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Creation for Children International NV
The Delhi High Court held that company directors are not personally liable for company debts absent personal guarantees or malfeasance, upheld the decree against the company alone, and dismissed the suit against the directors.
All India Carrom Federation v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court examined the validity of All India Carrom Federation elections held in 2015, emphasizing strict compliance with the Sports Code and Ministry oversight to ensure fair and transparent elections.
Vipin Malik & Anr. v. PACL India Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the execution petition against PACL India Ltd., holding that the Supreme Court-appointed Lodha Committee's exclusive mandate precludes release of funds for rent arrears, granting liberty to seek alternative remedies.
Govind Rawat v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed AIIMS's review petition, holding that resignation acceptance conditional on penalty payment is ineffective without such payment.
Dr. Bindu Rana v. Jai Radha Raman Education Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court addressed procedural aspects and maintainability of a Section 11 arbitration petition, allowed exemption from filing original documents, and noted parties' agreement on appointment of a second arbitrator.
Jagbir Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case, emphasizing that prosecution must prove cruelty soon before death beyond reasonable doubt and that appellate courts should not interfere with acquittals where two views are possible.
Through: Mr. N. Mahabir and Mr P.C. Arya, Advocate v. CHIKITSABROTI UDYOG (SANJIVAN HOSPITAL) & ORS
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to enforce an interim award and appointed a Local Commissioner with police assistance to remove hypothecated medical equipment from Respondents' premises.